Literature DB >> 21317047

RAD51-independent inverted-repeat recombination by a strand-annealing mechanism.

Christina Mott1, Lorraine S Symington.   

Abstract

Recombination between inverted repeats is RAD52 dependent, but reduced only modestly in the rad51Δ mutant. RAD59 is required for RAD51-independent inverted-repeat recombination, but no clear mechanism for how recombination occurs in the absence of RAD51 has emerged. Because Rad59 is thought to function as an accessory factor for the single-strand annealing activity of Rad52 one possible mechanism for spontaneous recombination could be by strand annealing between repeats at a stalled replication fork. Here we demonstrate the importance of the Rad52 single-strand annealing activity for generating recombinants by showing suppression of the rad52Δ, rad51Δ rad52Δ and rad52Δ rad59Δ inverted-repeat recombination defects by the rfa1-D228Y mutation. In addition, formation of recombinants in the rad51Δ mutant was sensitive to the distance between the inverted repeats, consistent with a replication-based mechanism. Deletion of RAD5 or RAD18, which are required for error-free post-replication repair, reduced the recombination rate in the rad59Δ mutant, but not in wild type. These data are consistent with RAD51-independent recombinants arising by a faulty template switch mechanism that is distinct from nascent strand template switching.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21317047      PMCID: PMC3062727          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  50 in total

1.  Aberrant double-strand break repair in rad51 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L E Kang; L S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO.

Authors:  Carsten Hoege; Boris Pfander; George-Lucian Moldovan; George Pyrowolakis; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Yeast spt6-140 mutation, affecting chromatin and transcription, preferentially increases recombination in which Rad51p-mediated strand exchange is dispensable.

Authors:  F Malagón; A Aguilera
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  The roles of REV3 and RAD57 in double-strand-break-repair-induced mutagenesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Alison J Rattray; Brenda K Shafer; Carolyn B McGill; Jeffrey N Strathern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The yeast recombinational repair protein Rad59 interacts with Rad52 and stimulates single-strand annealing.

Authors:  A P Davis; L S Symington
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The yeast DNA repair gene RAD6 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme.

Authors:  S Jentsch; J P McGrath; A Varshavsky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Sep 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The Rad52-Rad59 complex interacts with Rad51 and replication protein A.

Authors:  Allison P Davis; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2003-10-07

9.  Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation.

Authors:  N Sugawara; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Unrepaired heteroduplex DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is decreased in RAD1 RAD52-independent recombination.

Authors:  J P McDonald; R Rothstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  22 in total

1.  Mgm101 is a Rad52-related protein required for mitochondrial DNA recombination.

Authors:  MacMillan Mbantenkhu; Xiaowen Wang; Jonathan D Nardozzi; Stephan Wilkens; Elizabeth Hoffman; Anamika Patel; Michael S Cosgrove; Xin Jie Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  DNA damage during the G0/G1 phase triggers RNA-templated, Cockayne syndrome B-dependent homologous recombination.

Authors:  Leizhen Wei; Satoshi Nakajima; Stefanie Böhm; Kara A Bernstein; Zhiyuan Shen; Michael Tsang; Arthur S Levine; Li Lan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Repeat instability during DNA repair: Insights from model systems.

Authors:  Karen Usdin; Nealia C M House; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 4.  Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Cellular assays of DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Hannah L Klein; Giedrė Bačinskaja; Jun Che; Anais Cheblal; Rajula Elango; Anastasiya Epshtein; Devon M Fitzgerald; Belén Gómez-González; Sharik R Khan; Sandeep Kumar; Bryan A Leland; Léa Marie; Qian Mei; Judith Miné-Hattab; Alicja Piotrowska; Erica J Polleys; Christopher D Putnam; Elina A Radchenko; Anissia Ait Saada; Cynthia J Sakofsky; Eun Yong Shim; Mathew Stracy; Jun Xia; Zhenxin Yan; Yi Yin; Andrés Aguilera; Juan Lucas Argueso; Catherine H Freudenreich; Susan M Gasser; Dmitry A Gordenin; James E Haber; Grzegorz Ira; Sue Jinks-Robertson; Megan C King; Richard D Kolodner; Andrei Kuzminov; Sarah Ae Lambert; Sang Eun Lee; Kyle M Miller; Sergei M Mirkin; Thomas D Petes; Susan M Rosenberg; Rodney Rothstein; Lorraine S Symington; Pawel Zawadzki; Nayun Kim; Michael Lisby; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2019-01-07

5.  A saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase H2 interaction network functions to suppress genome instability.

Authors:  Stephanie Allen-Soltero; Sandra L Martinez; Christopher D Putnam; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Break-induced replication links microsatellite expansion to complex genome rearrangements.

Authors:  Michael Leffak
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  Cis- and Trans-Modifiers of Repeat Expansions: Blending Model Systems with Human Genetics.

Authors:  Ryan J McGinty; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  SUMOylation of Rad52-Rad59 synergistically change the outcome of mitotic recombination.

Authors:  Sonia Silva; Veronika Altmannova; Nadine Eckert-Boulet; Peter Kolesar; Irene Gallina; Lisa Hang; Inn Chung; Milica Arneric; Xiaolan Zhao; Line Due Buron; Uffe H Mortensen; Lumir Krejci; Michael Lisby
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-04-16

9.  Unligated Okazaki Fragments Induce PCNA Ubiquitination and a Requirement for Rad59-Dependent Replication Fork Progression.

Authors:  Hai Dang Nguyen; Jordan Becker; Yee Mon Thu; Michael Costanzo; Elizabeth N Koch; Stephanie Smith; Kyungjae Myung; Chad L Myers; Charles Boone; Anja-Katrin Bielinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chromosomal Rearrangements in Cancer: Detection and potential causal mechanisms.

Authors:  Paul Hasty; Cristina Montagna
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.