Literature DB >> 21310695

Women's own-gender bias in face recognition memory.

Johanna Lovén1, Agneta Herlitz, Jenny Rehnman.   

Abstract

Women remember more female than male faces, whereas men do not seem to display an own-gender bias in face recognition memory. Why women remember female faces to a greater extent than male faces is unclear; one proposition is that women attend more to and thereby process female faces more effortfully than male faces during encoding. A manipulation that distracts attention and reduces effortful processing may therefore decrease women's own-gender bias by reducing memory for female faces relative to male faces. In three separate experiments, women and men encoded female and male faces for later recognition in full attention and divided attention conditions. Results consistently showed that women, in contrast to men, displayed a reliable own-gender bias. Importantly, the magnitude of women's own-gender bias was not reduced in divided attention conditions, indicating that it is not a result of effortful processing of female faces. We suggest these results reflect that women have greater perceptual expertise for female faces, facilitating recognition memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21310695     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  21 in total

1.  Item response theory analyses of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT).

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Jeremy Wilmer; Grit Herzmann; Rankin Williams McGugin; Daniel Fiset; Ana E Van Gulick; Kaitlin F Ryan; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-02-02

2.  Neural evidence for the contribution of holistic processing but not attention allocation to the other-race effect on face memory.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Greta Minor; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Greater visual averaging of face identity for own-gender faces.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert; Ben Gautrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

4.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Kathleen Kemter; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Grammar, Gender and Demonstratives in Lateralized Imagery for Sentences.

Authors:  Mikkel Wallentin; Roberta Rocca; Sofia Stroustrup
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-08

6.  An update of the Benton Facial Recognition Test.

Authors:  Ebony Murray; Rachel Bennetts; Jeremy Tree; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  Asymmetric visual representation of sex from facial appearance.

Authors:  Marco Gandolfo; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-21

8.  Face gender modulates women's brain activity during face encoding.

Authors:  Johanna Lovén; Joakim Svärd; Natalie C Ebner; Agneta Herlitz; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The other-race effect in 3-year-old German and Cameroonian children.

Authors:  Janina Suhrke; Claudia Freitag; Bettina Lamm; Johanna Teiser; Ina Fassbender; Sonja Poloczek; Manuel Teubert; Isabel A Vöhringer; Heidi Keller; Monika Knopf; Arnold Lohaus; Gudrun Schwarzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-18

10.  When age matters: differences in facial mimicry and autonomic responses to peers' emotions in teenagers and adults.

Authors:  Martina Ardizzi; Mariateresa Sestito; Francesca Martini; Maria Alessandra Umiltà; Roberto Ravera; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.