Literature DB >> 34918217

An update of the Benton Facial Recognition Test.

Ebony Murray1, Rachel Bennetts2, Jeremy Tree3, Sarah Bate4.   

Abstract

The Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT) is a paper-and-pen task that is traditionally used to assess face perception skills in neurological, clinical and psychiatric conditions. Despite criticisms of its stimuli, the task enjoys a simple procedure and is rapid to administer. Further, it has recently been computerised (BFRT-c), allowing reliable measurement of completion times and the need for online testing. Here, in response to calls for repeat screening for the accurate detection of face processing deficits, we present the BFRT-Revised (BFRT-r): a new version of the BFRT-c that maintains the task's basic paradigm, but employs new, higher-quality stimuli that reflect recent theoretical advances in the field. An initial validation study with typical participants indicated that the BFRT-r has good internal reliability and content validity. A second investigation indicated that while younger and older participants had comparable accuracy, completion times were longer in the latter, highlighting the need for age-matched norms. Administration of the BFRT-r and BFRT-c to 32 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia resulted in improved sensitivity in diagnostic screening for the BFRT-r compared to the BFRT-c. These findings are discussed in relation to current diagnostic screening protocols for face perception deficits. The BFRT-r is stored in an open repository and is freely available to other researchers.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benton; Face matching; Face perception; Face recognition; Prosopagnosia; Response times

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34918217     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01727-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  46 in total

1.  Detailed exploration of face-related processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral findings.

Authors:  Marlene Behrmann; Galia Avidan; Jonathan J Marotta; Rutie Kimchi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A cross-syndrome study of the development of holistic face recognition in children with autism, Down syndrome, and Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Dagmara Annaz; Annette Karmiloff-Smith; Mark H Johnson; Michael S C Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2009-02-03

3.  The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Sarah Bate; Rachel J Bennetts; Jeremy J Tree; Amanda Adams; Ebony Murray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-07-24

4.  Is developmental prosopagnosia best characterised as an apperceptive or mnemonic condition?

Authors:  Federica Biotti; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Movement cues aid face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Rachel J Bennetts; Natalie Butcher; Karen Lander; Robert Udale; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Impairment in facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease.

Authors:  A L Benton; M W Van Allen
Journal:  Trans Am Neurol Assoc       Date:  1968

7.  Normal composite face effects in developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Federica Biotti; Esther Wu; Hua Yang; Guo Jiahui; Bradley Duchaine; Richard Cook
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Evidence of an eye movement-based memory effect in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Sarah Bate; Catherine Haslam; Jeremy J Tree; Timothy L Hodgson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.864

Review 10.  The problem of being bad at faces.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Sherryse L Corrow
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Not so fast! Response times in the computerized Benton Face Recognition Test may not reflect face recognition ability.

Authors:  Joseph DeGutis; Xian Li; Bar Yosef; Maruti V Mishra
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Modular community structure of the face network supports face recognition.

Authors:  Gidon Levakov; Olaf Sporns; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.861

3.  Face recognition improvements in adults and children with face recognition difficulties.

Authors:  Sarah Bate; Kirsten Dalrymple; Rachel J Bennetts
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-03-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.