Literature DB >> 36271178

Asymmetric visual representation of sex from facial appearance.

Marco Gandolfo1, Paul E Downing2.   

Abstract

We efficiently infer others' traits from their faces, and these inferences powerfully shape our social behaviour. Here, we investigated how sex is represented in facial appearance. Based on previous findings from sex-judgment tasks, we hypothesized that the perceptual encoding of sex is not balanced but rather polarized: for the processes that generate a sex percept, the default output is "male," and the representation of female faces extends that of the male, engaging activity over unique detectors that are not activated by male faces. We tested this hypothesis with the logic of Treisman's studies of visual search asymmetries, predicting that observers should more readily detect the presence of female faces amongst male distractors than vice versa. Across three experiments (N = 32 each), each using different face stimuli, we confirmed this prediction in response time and sensitivity measures. We apply GIST analyses to the face stimuli to exclude that the search asymmetry is explained by differences in image homogeneity. These findings demonstrate a property of the coding that links facial appearance with a significant social trait: the female face is coded as an extension of a male default. We offer a mechanistic description of perceptual detectors to account for our findings and posit that the origins of this polarized coding scheme are an outcome of biased early developmental experience.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face perception; Search asymmetry; Sex perception; Social vision; Visual search

Year:  2022        PMID: 36271178     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02199-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  50 in total

1.  Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities--and when in doubt, he is a male.

Authors:  Regine Armann; Isabelle Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Face processing in infancy: developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information.

Authors:  Ramesh S Bhatt; Evelin Bertin; Angela Hayden; Andrea Reed
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

3.  Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding.

Authors:  P E G Bestelmeyer; B C Jones; L M Debruine; A C Little; D I Perrett; A Schneider; L L M Welling; C A Conway
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-09-17

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces?

Authors:  V Bruce; A M Burton; E Hanna; P Healey; O Mason; A Coombes; R Fright; A Linney
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces.

Authors:  V Bruce; S Langton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  What gives a face its gender?

Authors:  E Brown; D I Perrett
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Spatial heterogeneity in the perception of face and form attributes.

Authors:  Arash Afraz; Maryam Vaziri Pashkam; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Configural information in gender categorisation.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Baudouin; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Facial expressions of emotion (KDEF): identification under different display-duration conditions.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.