Literature DB >> 19072998

Use of single MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT scans in both diagnosis and radiotherapy treatment planning in patients with head and neck cancer: advantage on target volume and critical organ delineation.

Miriam Gardner1, Philippe Halimi, Danielle Valinta, Marie-Madeleine Plantet, Jean-Louis Alberini, Myriam Wartski, Alain Banal, Stephane Hans, Jean-Louis Floiras, Martin Housset, Alain Labib.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of a single MRI and 18F-fluoro deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT (18F-FDG PET-CT) was evaluated, both in diagnostic procedure and radiotherapy planning, in patients with head and neck cancer.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients with nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal tumors were studied. The MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT were used for both diagnostic work-up and gross tumor volume and critical structure delineation. The interobserver variation (IOV) of volumes determined on MRI and CT by a radiotherapist and by a radiologist were compared as well as their impact on dose distribution.
RESULTS: The CT-MRI decreased the IOV of parotid glands in 12 of 35 and target volume in 15 of 35 patients. The use of 18F-FDG PET-CT changed the treatment design in 6 of 21 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic imaging performed in the treatment position can improve the accuracy of radiotherapy planning in case of intracranial tumor extension, heavy dental work, or contraindication for contrast-enhanced CT, but not in the absence of these conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19072998     DOI: 10.1002/hed.21005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  7 in total

1.  Interobserver and intermodality variability in GTV delineation on simulation CT, FDG-PET, and MR Images of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Carryn M Anderson; Wenqing Sun; John M Buatti; Joan E Maley; Bruno Policeni; Sarah L Mott; John E Bayouth
Journal:  Jacobs J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-09

Review 2.  Interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation: a study of its impact on intensity-modulated radiotherapy solutions with a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S W Loo; W M C Martin; P Smith; S Cherian; T W Roques
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  CT-based volumetric tumor growth velocity: A novel imaging prognostic indicator in oropharyngeal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.

Authors:  Subha Perni; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jacob Scott; Heiko Enderling; Adam S Garden; G Brandon Gunn; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR imaging in the head and upper neck area.

Authors:  Andreas Boss; Lars Stegger; Sotirios Bisdas; Armin Kolb; Nina Schwenzer; Markus Pfister; Claus D Claussen; Bernd J Pichler; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Use of PET in Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Halil Erdem Özel
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-01

6.  Error in the parotid contour delineated using computed tomography images rather than magnetic resonance images during radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Chengxin Liu; Xudong Kong; Guanzhong Gong; Tonghai Liu; Baosheng Li; Yong Yin
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Recent advances in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Sameer K Nath; Daniel R Simpson; Brent S Rose; Ajay P Sandhu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.