Literature DB >> 21307304

Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.

Kurt D Christensen1, J Scott Roberts, David I Shalowitz, Jessica N Everett, Scott Y H Kim, Leon Raskin, Stephen B Gruber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether to return individual research results from cancer genetics studies is widely debated, but little is known about how participants respond to results disclosure or about its time and cost burdens on investigators.
METHODS: We recontacted participants at one site of a multicenter genetic epidemiologic study regarding their CDKN2A gene test results and implications for melanoma risk. Interested participants were disclosed their results by telephone and followed for 3 months.
RESULTS: Among 39 patients approached, 27 were successfully contacted, and 19 (70% uptake) sought results, including three with mutations. Prior to disclosure, participants endorsed numerous benefits of receiving results (mean=7.7 of 9 posed), including gaining information relevant to their children's disease risk. Mean psychological well-being scores did not change from baseline, and no decreases to melanoma prevention behaviors were noted. Fifty-nine percent of participants reported that disclosure made participation in future research more likely. Preparation for disclosure required 40 minutes and $611 per recontact attempt. An additional 78 minutes and $68 was needed to disclose results.
CONCLUSION: Cancer epidemiology research participants who received their individual genetic research results showed no evidence of psychological harm or false reassurance from disclosure and expressed strong trust in the accuracy of results. Burdens to our investigators were high, but protocols may differ in their demands and disclosure may increase participants' willingness to enroll in future studies. IMPACT: Providing individual study results to cancer genetics research participants poses potential challenges for investigators, but many participants desire and respond positively to this information. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21307304      PMCID: PMC3833711          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  29 in total

1.  Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A design for cancer case-control studies using only incident cases: experience with the GEM study of melanoma.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Amanda J Hummer; Urvi Mujumdar; Bruce K Armstrong; Anne Kricker; Loraine D Marrett; Robert C Millikan; Stephen B Gruber; Hoda Anton Culver; Roberto Zanetti; Richard P Gallagher; Terrence Dwyer; Timothy R Rebbeck; Klaus Busam; Lynn From; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Anticipated uptake of genetic testing for familial melanoma in an Australian sample: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Bettina Meiser; Phyllis N Butow; R F Soames Job; Graham J Mann
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Uptake of offer to receive genetic information about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an Australian population-based study.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Melissa C Southey; Judi Maskiell; Mary-Anne Young; Clara L Gaff; Judy Kirk; Katherine M Tucker; Doreen Rosenthal; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  The prevalence of CDKN2A germ-line mutations and relative risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma: an international population-based study.

Authors:  Marianne Berwick; Irene Orlow; Amanda J Hummer; Bruce K Armstrong; Anne Kricker; Loraine D Marrett; Robert C Millikan; Stephen B Gruber; Hoda Anton-Culver; Roberto Zanetti; Richard P Gallagher; Terence Dwyer; Timothy R Rebbeck; Peter A Kanetsky; Klaus Busam; Lynn From; Urvi Mujumdar; Homer Wilcox; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Counseling and DNA testing for individuals perceived to be genetically predisposed to melanoma: A consensus statement of the Melanoma Genetics Consortium.

Authors:  R F Kefford; J A Newton Bishop; W Bergman; M A Tucker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Patient preferences regarding recontact by cancer genetics clinicians.

Authors:  Constance A Griffin; Jennifer E Axilbund; Ann Marie Codori; Ginny Deise; Betty May; Cheryl Pendergrass; Miriam Tillery; Jill D Trimbath; Francis M Giardiello
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

Authors:  C Lerman; S Narod; K Schulman; C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; G Bonney; K Gold; B Trock; D Main; J Lynch; C Fulmore; C Snyder; S J Lemon; T Conway; P Tonin; G Lenoir; H Lynch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  28 in total

1.  Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Nina Hallowell; Martin H N Tattersall; Judy Kirk; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Sarah K Savage; Noelle L Huntington; Elissa R Weitzman; Sonja I Ziniel; Phoebe L Bacon; Cara N Cacioppo; Robert C Green; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Laura A Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  Rare presentations of primary melanoma and special populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa A Kottschade; Travis E Grotz; Roxana S Dronca; Diva R Salomao; Jose S Pulido; Nabil Wasif; James W Jakub; Sanjay P Bagaria; Riten Kumar; Judith S Kaur; Shane Y Morita; Steven L Moran; Jesse T Nguyen; Emily C Nguyen; Jennifer L Hand; Lori A Erickson; Jerry D Brewer; Christian L Baum; Robert C Miller; David L Swanson; Val Lowe; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Melanoma genetic counseling and test reporting improve screening adherence among unaffected carriers 2 years later.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Mary Daly; Evelyn Stevens; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

7.  Views of Cohort Study Participants about Returning Research Results in the Context of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Travis Hyams; Deborah J Bowen; Celeste Condit; Jeremy Grossman; Megan Fitzmaurice; Deborah Goodman; Lari Wenzel; Karen L Edwards
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Histologic features of melanoma associated with CDKN2A genotype.

Authors:  Michael R Sargen; Peter A Kanetsky; Julia Newton-Bishop; Nicholas K Hayward; Graham J Mann; Nelleke A Gruis; Margaret A Tucker; Alisa M Goldstein; Giovanna Bianchi-Scarra; Susana Puig; David E Elder
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Using AD biomarker research results for clinical care: a survey of ADNI investigators.

Authors:  Melanie B Shulman; Kristin Harkins; Robert C Green; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Melanoma genetic testing, counseling, and adherence to skin cancer prevention and detection behaviors.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Kathryn Volpicelli; Peter A Kanetsky; Michael E Ming; Lynn M Schuchter; Christopher Jepson; Susan M Domchek; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.