Literature DB >> 15598789

Uptake of offer to receive genetic information about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an Australian population-based study.

Louise A Keogh1, Melissa C Southey, Judi Maskiell, Mary-Anne Young, Clara L Gaff, Judy Kirk, Katherine M Tucker, Doreen Rosenthal, Margaret R E McCredie, Graham G Giles, John L Hopper.   

Abstract

Research on the utilization of genetic testing services for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 has focused on women with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer. We conducted a population-based case-control-family study of Australian women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer before age 40 years, unselected for family history, and tested for germ line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Case subjects found to carry a deleterious mutation and their relatives who had given a research blood sample were informed by mail that the study had identified "genetic information" and were offered the opportunity to learn more. Those interested were referred to a government-funded family cancer clinic. Of 94 subjects who received the letter, 3 (3%) did not respond and 38 (40%) declined to learn their result (16 declined the referral, 10 accepted but did not attend a clinic, and 12 attended a clinic but declined testing), and 12 (13%) remain "on hold." The remaining 41 (44%) chose to learn their result (3 of whom already knew their mutation status). There was no evidence that the decision to learn of mutation status depended on age, gender, family history, or having been diagnosed with breast cancer. Of 19 families with more than one participant, in 11 (58%) there was discordance between relatives in receiving genetic results. Although in Australia genetic testing is offered free of charge and insurance issues are not a major consideration, we found considerable reluctance, indecision, and unexplained variability both between and within case families in the desire to know their mutation status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15598789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  Association of cancer worry and perceived risk with doctor avoidance: an analysis of information avoidance in a nationally representative US sample.

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-09-27

2.  Deaf genetic testing and psychological well-being in deaf adults.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Joshua L Deignan; Yoko Kobayashi; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne Grody; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic counseling for patients and families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in a developing Asian country: an observational descriptive study.

Authors:  Sook-Yee Yoon; Meow-Keong Thong; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Cheng-Har Yip; Soo-Hwang Teo
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry: an open resource for collaborative research.

Authors:  Susan L Neuhausen; Hilmi Ozcelik; Melissa C Southey; Esther M John; Andrew K Godwin; Wendy Chung; Jeniffer Iriondo-Perez; Alexander Miron; Regina M Santella; Alice Whittemore; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; John L Hopper; Daniela Seminara; Ruby T Senie; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Amanda M Willis; Sian K Smith; Bettina Meiser; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Martin Tattersall; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS).

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Loren Plunkett; Laura E Forrest; Nina Hallowell; Samantha Wake; Kathryn Alsop; Margaret Gleeson; David Bowtell; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.

Authors:  Louise Keogh; Paul Lacaze; Jane Tiller; Aideen McInerney-Leo; Andrea Belcher; Tiffany Boughtwood; Penny Gleeson; Martin Delatycki; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Ingrid Winship; Margaret Otlowski
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Kara N Maxwell; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Dominique Fetzer; Jill Bennett Gaieski; Amanda Brandt; Danielle McKenna; Jessica Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.