Literature DB >> 23966249

Using AD biomarker research results for clinical care: a survey of ADNI investigators.

Melanie B Shulman1, Kristin Harkins, Robert C Green, Jason Karlawish.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To inform whether the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) should change its policy of not returning research results to ADNI participants, we surveyed investigators and research staff about disclosing ADNI biomarker information to research participants, with particular emphasis on amyloid imaging results.
METHODS: In April 2012, just before Food and Drug Administration approval of the amyloid-binding radiotracer, florbetapir, all ADNI investigators and personnel were recruited to complete an anonymous online survey that contained fixed choice and free-text questions.
RESULTS: Although ADNI participants often requested amyloid imaging results (the proportions of investigators who reported requests from more than half of their participants with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment were 20% and 22%, respectively), across all diagnostic groups, the majority of ADNI investigators (approximately 90%) did not return amyloid imaging results to ADNI participants. However, the majority of investigators reported that, if the Food and Drug Administration approved florbetapir, they would support the return of amyloid imaging results to participants with mild cognitive impairment and normal cognition, but they emphasized the need for guidance on how to provide these results to participants and for research to assess the value of returning results as well as how returning results will affect study validity and participant well-being.
CONCLUSIONS: A majority of ADNI investigators support returning amyloid imaging results to ADNI participants. The findings that they want guidance on how to do this and research on the impact of disclosure suggest how to develop and monitor a disclosure process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966249      PMCID: PMC3795601          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a55f4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  16 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Testing the right target and right drug at the right stage.

Authors:  Reisa A Sperling; Clifford R Jack; Paul S Aisen
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: state of the science.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Julia S Wong; Katherine Knudsen; Rebecca Gelman; Ebonie Sampson; Michele Gadd; Karyn L Bishop; Jay R Harris; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Return of research results: general principles and international perspectives.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lévesque; Yann Joly; Jacques Simard
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing for hereditary ataxia and neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Corrine O Smith; Hillary P Lipe; Thomas D Bird
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-06

9.  Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Brittney N Crock; Brian Van Ness; Frances Lawrenz; Jeffrey P Kahn; Laura M Beskow; Mildred K Cho; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Ralph Hall; Judy Illes; Moira Keane; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Isaac S Kohane; Bonnie Leroy; Karen J Maschke; William McGeveran; Pilar Ossorio; Lisa S Parker; Gloria M Petersen; Henry S Richardson; Joan A Scott; Sharon F Terry; Benjamin S Wilfond; Wendy A Wolf
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  17 in total

1.  The influence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers on clinical dementia evaluations.

Authors:  Jonathan Gooblar; Brian D Carpenter; Mary A Coats; John C Morris; B Joy Snider
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 2.  2014 Update of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Jesse Cedarbaum; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Johan Luthman; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie Shaw; Li Shen; Adam Schwarz; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Patient and caregiver reactions to clinical amyloid imaging.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Chelsea G Cox; Sarah Kremen; Mario F Mendez; Edmond Teng; Jill Shapira; John M Ringman; Liana G Apostolova
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 4.  Genetic studies of quantitative MCI and AD phenotypes in ADNI: Progress, opportunities, and plans.

Authors:  Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen; Xiaohui Yao; Sungeun Kim; Kwangsik Nho; Shannon L Risacher; Vijay K Ramanan; Tatiana M Foroud; Kelley M Faber; Nadeem Sarwar; Leanne M Munsie; Xiaolan Hu; Holly D Soares; Steven G Potkin; Paul M Thompson; John S K Kauwe; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; Robert C Green; Arthur W Toga; Michael W Weiner
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Dementia: Disclosure of results to participants in dementia research.

Authors:  Serge Gauthier; Pedro Rosa-Neto
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Comprehension of an Elevated Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Biomarker Result by Cognitively Normal Older Adults.

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Pamela Sankar; Kristin Harkins; Sara Hachey; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results.

Authors:  Jonathan Gooblar; Catherine M Roe; Natalie J Selsor; Matthew J Gabel; John C Morris
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 18.302

8.  Development of a process to disclose amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal older adult research participants.

Authors:  Kristin Harkins; Pamela Sankar; Reisa Sperling; Joshua D Grill; Robert C Green; Keith A Johnson; Megan Healy; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 6.982

9.  A Survey of Knowledge and Views Concerning Genetic and Amyloid PET Status Disclosure.

Authors:  B R Ott; M A Pelosi; G Tremont; P J Snyder
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-01

Review 10.  Ethical Issues Posed by Field Research Using Highly Portable and Cloud-Enabled Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Francis X Shen; Susan M Wolf; Ramon Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.