Literature DB >> 9352388

Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling.

B Meibohm1, H Derendorf.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) information from the scientific basis of modern pharmacotherapy. Pharmacokinetics describes the drug concentration-time courses in body fluids resulting from administration of a certain drug dose, pharmacodynamics the observed effect resulting from a certain drug concentration. The rationale for PK/PD-modelling is to link pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in order to establish and evaluate dose-concentration-response relationships and subsequently describe and predict the effect-time courses resulting from a drug dose. Under pharmacokinetic steady-state conditions, concentration-effect relationships can be described by several relatively simple pharmacodynamic models, which comprise the fixed effect model, the linear model, the long-linear model, the Emax-model and the sigmoid Emax-model. Under non steady-state conditions, more complex integrated PK/PD-models are necessary to link and account for a possible temporal dissociation between the plasma concentration and the observed effect. Four basic attributes may be used to characterize PK/PD-models: First, the link between measured concentration and the pharmacologic response mechanism that mediates the observed effect, direct vs. indirect link; second, the response mechanism that mediates the observed effect, direct vs. indirect response; third, the information used to establish the link between measured concentration and observed effect, hard vs. soft link; and fourth, the time dependency of the involved pharmacodynamic parameters, time-variant vs. time-invariant. In general, PK/PD-modelling based on the underlying physiological process should be preferred whenever possible. The expanded use of PK/PD-modelling is assumed to be highly beneficial for drug development as well as applied pharmacotherapy and will most likely improve the current state of applied therapeutics.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9352388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  71 in total

Review 1.  Accounting for noncompliance in pharmacoeconomic evaluations.

Authors:  D A Hughes; A Bagust; A Haycox; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Economic evaluations during early (phase II) drug development: a role for clinical trial simulations?

Authors:  D A Hughes; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives.

Authors:  H Derendorf; B Meibohm
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC.

Authors:  Markus Mueller; Amparo de la Peña; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  Wayne A Colburn; Jean W Lee
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Grey-box pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of a euglycaemic clamp study.

Authors:  Christoffer Wenzel Tornøe; Judith L Jacobsen; Henrik Madsen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Estimation of Cmax and Tmax in populations after single and multiple drug administrations.

Authors:  Laszlo Tothfalusi; Laszlo Endrenyi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Predicting brain occupancy from plasma levels using PET: superiority of combining pharmacokinetics with pharmacodynamics while modeling the relationship.

Authors:  Euitae Kim; Oliver D Howes; Bo-Hyung Kim; Jae Min Jeong; Jae Sung Lee; In-Jin Jang; Sang-Goo Shin; Federico E Turkheimer; Shitij Kapur; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Long-lasting target binding and rebinding as mechanisms to prolong in vivo drug action.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Protein mimetic amyloid inhibitor potently abrogates cancer-associated mutant p53 aggregation and restores tumor suppressor function.

Authors:  L Palanikumar; Laura Karpauskaite; Mohamed Al-Sayegh; Ibrahim Chehade; Maheen Alam; Sarah Hassan; Debabrata Maity; Liaqat Ali; Mona Kalmouni; Yamanappa Hunashal; Jemil Ahmed; Tatiana Houhou; Shake Karapetyan; Zackary Falls; Ram Samudrala; Renu Pasricha; Gennaro Esposito; Ahmed J Afzal; Andrew D Hamilton; Sunil Kumar; Mazin Magzoub
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.