Literature DB >> 21305472

Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells analogous to naïve and primed embryonic stem cells of the mouse.

Bhanu Prakash V L Telugu1, Toshihiko Ezashi, R Michael Roberts.   

Abstract

Authentic or naïve embryonic stem cells (ESC) have probably never been derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of pig blastocysts, despite over 25 years of effort. Recently, several groups, including ours, have reported induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) from swine by reprogramming somatic cells with a combination of four factors, OCT4 (POU5F1)/SOX2/KLF4/c-MYC delivered by retroviral transduction. The porcine (p) iPSC resembled human (h) ESC and the mouse "Epiblast stem cells" (EpiSC) in their colony morphology and expression of pluripotent genes, and are likely dependent on FGF2/ACTIVIN/NODAL signaling, therefore representing a primed ESC state. These cells are likely to advance swine as a model in biomedical research, since grafts could potentially be matched to the animal that donated the cells for re-programming. The objective of the present work has been to develop naïve piPSC. Employing a combination of seven reprogramming factors assembled on episomal vectors, we successfully reprogrammed porcine embryonic fibroblasts on a modified LIF-medium supplemented with two kinase inhibitors; CHIR99021, which inhibits GSK-3beta, and PD0325901, a MEK inhibitor. The derived piPSC bear a striking resemblance to naïve mESC in colony morphology, are dependent on LIF to maintain an undifferentiated phenotype, and express markers consistent with pluripotency. They exhibit high telomerase activity, a short cell cycle interval, and a normal karyotype, and are able to generate teratomas. Currently, the competence of these lines for contributing to germ-line chimeras is being tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21305472      PMCID: PMC9006238          DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.103200bt

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Biol        ISSN: 0214-6282            Impact factor:   2.203


  72 in total

1.  On the isolation of embryonic stem cells: Comparative behavior of murine, porcine and ovine embryos.

Authors:  J A Piedrahita; G B Anderson; R H Bondurant
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Albert W Cheng; Krishanu Saha; Jongpil Kim; Christopher J Lengner; Frank Soldner; John P Cassady; Julien Muffat; Bryce W Carey; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Establishment of pluripotent cell lines from porcine preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  L R Chen; Y L Shiue; L Bertolini; J F Medrano; R H BonDurant; G B Anderson
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells.

Authors:  M Tada; Y Takahama; K Abe; N Nakatsuji; T Tada
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Conserved and divergent roles of FGF signaling in mouse epiblast stem cells and human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Boris Greber; Guangming Wu; Christof Bernemann; Jin Young Joo; Dong Wook Han; Kinarm Ko; Natalia Tapia; Davood Sabour; Jared Sterneckert; Paul Tesar; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Chad A Cowan; Jocelyn Atienza; Douglas A Melton; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells.

Authors:  G R Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Identification of oxygen-sensitive transcriptional programs in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Suzanne D Westfall; Shrikesh Sachdev; Padmalaya Das; Leonard B Hearne; Mark Hannink; R Michael Roberts; Toshihiko Ezashi
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.272

9.  Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Krüppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  John Hall; Ge Guo; Jason Wray; Isobel Eyres; Jennifer Nichols; Lars Grotewold; Sofia Morfopoulou; Peter Humphreys; William Mansfield; Rachael Walker; Simon Tomlinson; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos.

Authors:  I Gabrielle M Brons; Lucy E Smithers; Matthew W B Trotter; Peter Rugg-Gunn; Bowen Sun; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Sarah K Howlett; Amanda Clarkson; Lars Ahrlund-Richter; Roger A Pedersen; Ludovic Vallier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  38 in total

1.  Stirred Suspension Bioreactor Culture of Porcine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Kyle Burrell; Rkia Dardari; Taylor Goldsmith; Derek Toms; Daniel A F Villagomez; William Allan King; Mark Ungrin; Franklin D West; Ina Dobrinski
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 2.  Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bhanu P Telugu; Ki-Eun Park; Chi-Hun Park
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Identification of SSEA-1 expressing enhanced reprogramming (SEER) cells in porcine embryonic fibroblasts.

Authors:  Dong Li; Jan O Secher; Morten Juhl; Kaveh Mashayekhi; Troels T Nielsen; Bjørn Holst; Poul Hyttel; Kristine K Freude; Vanessa J Hall
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Generation of naive-like porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells capable of contributing to embryonic and fetal development.

Authors:  Shuh-hei Fujishiro; Kazuaki Nakano; Yoshihisa Mizukami; Takuya Azami; Yoshikazu Arai; Hitomi Matsunari; Rikiya Ishino; Takashi Nishimura; Masahito Watanabe; Tomoyuki Abe; Yutaka Furukawa; Kazuhiro Umeyama; Shinya Yamanaka; Masatsugu Ema; Hiroshi Nagashima; Yutaka Hanazono
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  Induced pluripotent stem cells from farm animals.

Authors:  Yue Su; Jiaqi Zhu; Saleh Salman; Young Tang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Vascular smooth muscle cells derived from inbred swine induced pluripotent stem cells for vascular tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jiesi Luo; Lingfeng Qin; Mehmet H Kural; Jonas Schwan; Xia Li; Oscar Bartulos; Xiao-Qiang Cong; Yongming Ren; Liqiong Gui; Guangxin Li; Matthew W Ellis; Peining Li; Darrell N Kotton; Alan Dardik; Jordan S Pober; George Tellides; Marsha Rolle; Stuart Campbell; Robert J Hawley; David H Sachs; Laura E Niklason; Yibing Qyang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Pluripotent stem cells and livestock genetic engineering.

Authors:  Delia A Soto; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 8.  Searching for naïve human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Simone Aparecida Siqueira Fonseca; Roberta Montero Costas; Lygia Veiga Pereira
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

9.  Generation of transgene-free porcine intermediate type induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Dong Li; Jan Secher; Poul Hyttel; Marilin Ivask; Miriam Kolko; Vanessa Jane Hall; Kristine K Freude
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  miRNAs promote generation of porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Kuiying Ma; Guangqi Song; Xinglan An; Anran Fan; Wentao Tan; Bo Tang; Xueming Zhang; Ziyi Li
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.