Literature DB >> 28426281

Identification of SSEA-1 expressing enhanced reprogramming (SEER) cells in porcine embryonic fibroblasts.

Dong Li1, Jan O Secher1, Morten Juhl2, Kaveh Mashayekhi1,3,4, Troels T Nielsen5, Bjørn Holst6, Poul Hyttel1, Kristine K Freude1, Vanessa J Hall1.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that a subpopulation of cells within cultured human dermal fibroblasts, termed multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells, are preferentially reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells. However, controversy exists over whether these cells are the only cells capable of being reprogrammed from a heterogeneous population of fibroblasts. Similarly, there is little research to suggest such cells may exist in embryonic tissues or other species. To address if such a cell population exists in pigs, we investigated porcine embryonic fibroblast populations (pEFs) and identified heterogeneous expression of several key cell surface markers. Strikingly, we discovered a small population of stage-specific embryonic antigen 1 positive cells (SSEA-1+) in Danish Landrace and Göttingen minipig pEFs, which were absent in the Yucatan pEFs. Furthermore, reprogramming of SSEA-1+ sorted pEFs led to higher reprogramming efficiency. Subsequent transcriptome profiling of the SSEA-1+ vs. the SSEA-1neg cell fraction revealed highly comparable gene signatures. However several genes that were found to be upregulated in the SSEA-1+ cells were similarly expressed in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We therefore termed these cells SSEA-1 Expressing Enhanced Reprogramming (SEER) cells. Interestingly, SEER cells were more effective at differentiating into osteocytes and chondrocytes in vitro. We conclude that SEER cells are more amenable for reprogramming and that the expression of mesenchymal stem cell genes is advantageous in the reprogramming process. This data provides evidence supporting the elite theory and helps to delineate which cell types and specific genes are important for reprogramming in the pig.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SSEA-1; fibroblast; induced pluripotent stem cell; porcine; reprogramming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28426281      PMCID: PMC5499827          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1315490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  43 in total

1.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from neural stem cells.

Authors:  Jeong Beom Kim; Holm Zaehres; Marcos J Araúzo-Bravo; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells.

Authors:  Keisuke Okita; Yasuko Matsumura; Yoshiko Sato; Aki Okada; Asuka Morizane; Satoshi Okamoto; Hyenjong Hong; Masato Nakagawa; Koji Tanabe; Ken-ichi Tezuka; Toshiyuki Shibata; Takahiro Kunisada; Masayo Takahashi; Jun Takahashi; Hiroh Saji; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells produce chimeric offspring.

Authors:  Franklin D West; Steve L Terlouw; Dae Jin Kwon; Jennifer L Mumaw; Sujoy K Dhara; Kowser Hasneen; John R Dobrinsky; Steven L Stice
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Comparison of clinical grade human platelet lysates for cultivation of mesenchymal stromal cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue.

Authors:  Morten Juhl; Josefine Tratwal; Bjarke Follin; Rebekka H Søndergaard; Maria Kirchhoff; Annette Ekblond; Jens Kastrup; Mandana Haack-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.713

5.  Fibroblasts share mesenchymal phenotypes with stem cells, but lack their differentiation and colony-forming potential.

Authors:  Eckhard Alt; Yasheng Yan; Sebastian Gehmert; Yao-Hua Song; Andrew Altman; Sanga Gehmert; Daynene Vykoukal; Xiaowen Bai
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 6.  Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Yosef Buganim; Dina A Faddah; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  The importance of large animal models in transplantation.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Dehoux; Pierre Gianello
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2007-09-01

8.  Highly coordinated proteome dynamics during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency.

Authors:  Jenny Hansson; Mahmoud Reza Rafiee; Sonja Reiland; Jose M Polo; Julian Gehring; Satoshi Okawa; Wolfgang Huber; Konrad Hochedlinger; Jeroen Krijgsveld
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Incorporating double copies of a chromatin insulator into lentiviral vectors results in less viral integrants.

Authors:  Troels T Nielsen; Johan Jakobsson; Nina Rosenqvist; Cecilia Lundberg
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.563

10.  Neural differentiation potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: misleading marker gene expression.

Authors:  Katrin Montzka; Nina Lassonczyk; Beate Tschöke; Sabine Neuss; Tobias Führmann; Rachelle Franzen; Ralf Smeets; Gary A Brook; Michael Wöltje
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  2 in total

1.  Study of the protective effect on damaged intestinal epithelial cells of rat multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells.

Authors:  Dong Sun; Liu Yang; Huan Cao; Zhong-Yang Shen; Hong-Li Song
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Oocytes, embryos and pluripotent stem cells from a biomedical perspective.

Authors:  Poul Hyttel; Laís Vicari de Figueiredo Pessôa; Jan Bojsen-Møller Secher; Katarina Stoklund Dittlau; Kristine Freude; Vanessa J Hall; Trudee Fair; Remmy John Assey; Jozef Laurincik; Henrik Callesen; Torben Greve; Lotte Björg Stroebech
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.807

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.