Literature DB >> 7304560

Induction and latent periods.

K J Rothman.   

Abstract

Induction and latent periods are distinguishable concepts referring respectively to the period between causal action and disease initiation, and the period between disease initiation and detection. A disease cannot be characterized as having a long or short induction period, except in relation to a specific etiologic component. Inappropriate assumptions, explicit or implicit, about the length of the combined induction and latent period (the "empirical induction period") in an analytic study result in nondifferential misclassification and bias toward the null. Repeated analyses, varying the assumptions about the length of the empirical induction period, can be used to minimize such misclassification, thereby providing estimates for an undiluted measure of effect and the mode of the empirical induction period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7304560     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  76 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial relations between age specific mortality and ambient air quality in the United States: regression results for counties, 1960-97.

Authors:  F W Lipfert; S C Morris
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  The association of tooth loss with all-cause and circulatory mortality. Is there a benefit of replaced teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ines Polzer; Christian Schwahn; Henry Völzke; Torsten Mundt; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Lagging exposure information in cumulative exposure-response analyses.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu; Bryan Langholz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Etiology of testicular germ cell tumors: lumping or splitting? A plea against lumping.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Copy-years viremia as a measure of cumulative human immunodeficiency virus viral burden.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Sonia Napravnik; Michael J Mugavero; Bryan Lau; Joseph J Eron; Michael S Saag
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Sensitivity of the association between increased lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure to the assumptions in the assessment of exposure.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Igor Burstyn; Gilles Ferro; Ann Olsson; Mia Hashibe; Hans Kromhout; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Challenges in evaluating cancer as a clinical outcome in postapproval studies of drug safety.

Authors:  Simone P Pinheiro; Donna R Rivera; David J Graham; Andrew N Freedman; Jacqueline M Major; Lynne Penberthy; Mark Levenson; Marie C Bradley; Hui-Lee Wong; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Lifetime exposure to arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: a population-based case-control study in Michigan, USA.

Authors:  Jaymie R Meliker; Melissa J Slotnick; Gillian A AvRuskin; David Schottenfeld; Geoffrey M Jacquez; Mark L Wilson; Pierre Goovaerts; Alfred Franzblau; Jerome O Nriagu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Cancer morbidity among workers in the telecommunications industry.

Authors:  D Vågerö; A Ahlbom; R Olin; S Sahlsten
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1985-03

10.  Brain cancer and nonoccupational risk factors: a case-control study among workers at two nuclear facilities.

Authors:  A V Carpenter; W D Flanders; E L Frome; P Cole; S A Fry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.