Literature DB >> 21303017

Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids.

Teresa Y C Ching1, Emma van Wanrooy, Harvey Dillon, Lyndal Carter.   

Abstract

Listening to speech in competing sounds poses a major difficulty for children with impaired hearing. This study aimed to determine the ability of children (3-12 yr of age) to use spatial separation between target speech and competing babble to improve speech intelligibility. Fifty-eight children (31 with normal hearing and 27 with impaired hearing who use bilateral hearing aids) were assessed by word and sentence material. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured with speech presented from 0° azimuth, and competing babble from either 0° or ±90° azimuth. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was defined as the difference between SRTs measured with co-located speech and babble and SRTs measured with spatially separated speech and babble. On average, hearing-impaired children attained near-normal performance when speech and babble originated from the frontal source, but performed poorer than their normal-hearing peers when babble was spatially separated from target speech. On average, normal-hearing children obtained an SRM of 3 dB whereas children with hearing loss did not demonstrate SRM. Results suggest that hearing-impaired children may need enhancement in signal-to-noise ratio to hear speech in difficult listening conditions as well as normal-hearing children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21303017      PMCID: PMC3055291          DOI: 10.1121/1.3523295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Patti M Johnstone; Shelly P Godar
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults.

Authors:  Patti M Johnstone; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Selective auditory attention in 3- to 5-year-old children: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Courtney Stevens; Donna Coch; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.

Authors:  Véronique Vaillancourt; Chantal Laroche; Christian Giguère; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).

Authors:  Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  The psychoacoustics of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  19 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Xing Wang; Ning-Yu Wang; Xin Fu; Tian Gan; John J Galvin; Shelby Willis; Kevin Xu; Mathew Thomas; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Language and speech perception of young children with bimodal fitting or bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Julia Day; Patricia Van Buynder; Sanna Hou; Vicky Zhang; Mark Seeto; Lauren Burns; Christopher Flynn
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-05

4.  Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Amanda M Griffin; Sarah F Poissant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Eric Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein; Caitlin Rice; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Authors:  Teresa Yc Ching; Vicky W Zhang; Christopher Flynn; Lauren Burns; Laura Button; Sanna Hou; Karen McGhie; Patricia Van Buynder
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Spatial release from masking in reverberation for school-age children.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Florian Pausch; Janina Fels
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech-in-Speech Recognition and Spatially Selective Attention in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Kelly M Dean; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Can visual capture of sound separate auditory streams?

Authors:  Chiara Valzolgher; Elena Giovanelli; Roberta Sorio; Giuseppe Rabini; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.