Literature DB >> 16938772

The psychoacoustics of binaural hearing.

Michael A Akeroyd1.   

Abstract

This paper introduces the major phenomena of binaural hearing. The sounds arriving at the two ears are rarely the same: usually one ear will be partially shadowed from the sound source by the head, and the sound will also have to travel further to get to that ear. The resulting differences in interaural level and time can be detected by the auditory system and can be used to determine the direction of the source of sound. They also facilitate improvements in the detectability of a target sound masked by some other sound from some other direction. In many circumstances there is a special emphasis to the onset of a sound, which helps to perceptually suppress the complex patterns of reflections and reverberations that are present in most listening environments; yet, the auditory system is often insensitive to-and cannot take advantage of-fast dynamic changes within a sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938772     DOI: 10.1080/14992020600782626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  26 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: A New Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel M Zeitler; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-04

3.  William House Cochlear Implant Study Group: position statement on bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Thomas Balkany; Anelle Hodges; Fred Telischi; Ronald Hoffman; Jane Madell; Simon Parisier; Bruce Gantz; Richard Tyler; Robert Peters; Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Chronic detachable headphones for acoustic stimulation in freely moving animals.

Authors:  Fernando R Nodal; Peter Keating; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  [Processing of interaural time differences in normal-hearing subjects and cochlear implant users with FSP and HDCIS coding strategy].

Authors:  N Heidekrüger; T Rahne; L Wagner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Xing Wang; Ning-Yu Wang; Xin Fu; Tian Gan; John J Galvin; Shelby Willis; Kevin Xu; Mathew Thomas; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Authors:  Teresa Yc Ching; Vicky W Zhang; Christopher Flynn; Lauren Burns; Laura Button; Sanna Hou; Karen McGhie; Patricia Van Buynder
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 8.  [Cochlear implant treatment in Germany].

Authors:  R Jacob; Y Stelzig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhou; Huajun Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Anneke Lenssen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.