Literature DB >> 22662060

Contrast agent-free sonoporation: The use of an ultrasonic standing wave microfluidic system for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents.

Dario Carugo, Dyan N Ankrett, Peter Glynne-Jones, Lorenzo Capretto, Rosemary J Boltryk, Xunli Zhang, Paul A Townsend, Martyn Hill.   

Abstract

Sonoporation is a useful biophysical mechanism for facilitating the transmembrane delivery of therapeutic agents from the extracellular to the intracellular milieu. Conventionally, sonoporation is carried out in the presence of ultrasound contrast agents, which are known to greatly enhance transient poration of biological cell membranes. However, in vivo contrast agents have been observed to induce capillary rupture and haemorrhage due to endothelial cell damage and to greatly increase the potential for cell lysis in vitro. Here, we demonstrate sonoporation of cardiac myoblasts in the absence of contrast agent (CA-free sonoporation) using a low-cost ultrasound-microfluidic device. Within this device an ultrasonic standing wave was generated, allowing control over the position of the cells and the strength of the acoustic radiation forces. Real-time single-cell analysis and retrospective post-sonication analysis of insonated cardiac myoblasts showed that CA-free sonoporation induced transmembrane transfer of fluorescent probes (CMFDA and FITC-dextran) and that different mechanisms potentially contribute to membrane poration in the presence of an ultrasonic wave. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, we have shown for the first time that sonoporation induces increased cell cytotoxicity as a consequence of CA-free ultrasound-facilitated uptake of pharmaceutical agents (doxorubicin, luteolin, and apigenin). The US-microfluidic device designed here provides an in vitro alternative to expensive and controversial in vivo models used for early stage drug discovery, and drug delivery programs and toxicity measurements.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22662060      PMCID: PMC3364807          DOI: 10.1063/1.3660352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  47 in total

Review 1.  A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects.

Authors:  K G Baker; V J Robertson; F A Duck
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-07

2.  Modelling of particle paths passing through an ultrasonic standing wave.

Authors:  R J Townsend; M Hill; N R Harris; N M White
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Optimisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells.

Authors:  Hai-Dong Liang; Qi Long Lu; Shao-An Xue; Michael Halliwell; Tetsuya Kodama; David O Cosgrove; Hans J Stauss; Terence A Partridge; Martin J K Blomley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo.

Authors:  Joo Ha Hwang; Andrew A Brayman; Michael A Reidy; Thomas J Matula; Michael B Kimmey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  A microfluidic-based system for analysis of single cells based on Ca2+ flux.

Authors:  Xunli Zhang; Huabing Yin; Jon M Cooper; Stephen J Haswell
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  Claus-Dieter Ohl; Manish Arora; Roy Ikink; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Michael Delius; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Optimised production of multifunctional microfibres by microfluidic chip technology for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Stefania Mazzitelli; Lorenzo Capretto; Dario Carugo; Xunli Zhang; Roberta Piva; Claudio Nastruzzi
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Analysis of gene expression at the single-cell level using microdroplet-based microfluidic technology.

Authors:  Pascaline Mary; Luce Dauphinot; Nadège Bois; Marie-Claude Potier; Vincent Studer; Patrick Tabeling
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Properties of a clonal muscle cell line from rat heart.

Authors:  B W Kimes; B L Brandt
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1976-03-15       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  Continuous-flow production of polymeric micelles in microreactors: experimental and computational analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Capretto; Dario Carugo; Wei Cheng; Martyn Hill; Xunli Zhang
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 8.128

View more
  15 in total

1.  The role of acoustofluidics in targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Nilanjana Bose; Xunli Zhang; Tapas K Maiti; Suman Chakraborty
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Acoustofluidic sonoporation for gene delivery to human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Jason N Belling; Liv K Heidenreich; Zhenhua Tian; Alexandra M Mendoza; Tzu-Ting Chiou; Yao Gong; Natalie Y Chen; Thomas D Young; Natcha Wattanatorn; Jae Hyeon Park; Leonardo Scarabelli; Naihao Chiang; Jack Takahashi; Stephen G Young; Adam Z Stieg; Satiro De Oliveira; Tony Jun Huang; Paul S Weiss; Steven J Jonas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effective cell collection method using collagenase and ultrasonic vibration.

Authors:  Y Kurashina; K Takemura; S Miyata; J Komotori; T Koyama
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Layered acoustofluidic resonators for the simultaneous optical and acoustic characterisation of cavitation dynamics, microstreaming, and biological effects.

Authors:  V Pereno; M Aron; O Vince; C Mannaris; A Seth; M de Saint Victor; G Lajoinie; M Versluis; C Coussios; D Carugo; E Stride
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 5.  Sonoporation: Gene transfer using ultrasound.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Makoto Sueishi
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2013-12-26

6.  Ultrasound-induced molecular delivery to erythrocytes using a microfluidic system.

Authors:  Connor S Centner; Emily M Murphy; Mariah C Priddy; John T Moore; Brett R Janis; Michael A Menze; Andrew P DeFilippis; Jonathan A Kopechek
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Generation of functional hepatocyte 3D discoids in an acoustofluidic bioreactor.

Authors:  Mogibelrahman M S Khedr; Walid Messaoudi; Umesh S Jonnalagadda; Ahmed M Abdelmotelb; Peter Glynne-Jones; Martyn Hill; Salim I Khakoo; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joseph Rich; Zhenhua Tian; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-09-14

Review 9.  Physical methods for intracellular delivery: practical aspects from laboratory use to industrial-scale processing.

Authors:  J Mark Meacham; Kiranmai Durvasula; F Levent Degertekin; Andrei G Fedorov
Journal:  J Lab Autom       Date:  2013-06-27

10.  Microchannel acoustophoresis does not impact survival or function of microglia, leukocytes or tumor cells.

Authors:  Miguel A Burguillos; Cecilia Magnusson; Maria Nordin; Andreas Lenshof; Per Augustsson; Magnus J Hansson; Eskil Elmér; Hans Lilja; Patrik Brundin; Thomas Laurell; Tomas Deierborg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.