Literature DB >> 11179611

The search for cavitation in vivo.

E L Carstensen1, S Gracewski, D Dalecki.   

Abstract

Until the mid 1970s, it was generally assumed that, with the short pulses of ultrasound (US) used in medical diagnosis, there was little need for concern about the possibility of inertial cavitation in vivo. This assumption came into question when experimental evidence indicated that killing of fruit fly larvae by diagnostically relevant US was associated with the presence of gas in the respiratory apparatus of the organisms. Independent theoretical contributions by Flynn and Apfel in the early 1980s made it clear that complacency in regard to cavitation was not warranted. Later, the mammalian lung, as with larva, was shown to be particularly vulnerable when it contained air. Yet, overall evidence suggests that lung hemorrhage is not consistent with the classical picture of inertial cavitation. Most recently, however, hemolysis and hemorrhage associated with the use of contrast agents have provided nearly incontrovertible evidence of the occurrence of cavitation in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11179611     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00271-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  20 in total

1.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.

Authors:  Yuriy A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Tim Colonius; Lawrence A Crum; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

3.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Authors:  Boris Krasovitski; Victor Frenkel; Shy Shoham; Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Novel drug-delivery approaches to the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wang; Xiaowen Yu; William Vaughan; Mingyuan Liu; Yangtai Guan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 5.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Response of Single Cells to Shock Waves and Numerically Optimized Waveforms for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Dongli Li; Antonio Pellegrino; Andre Hallack; Nik Petrinic; Antoine Jérusalem; Robin O Cleveland
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  An investigation of the physical forces leading to thrombosis disruption by cavitation.

Authors:  Zoubeir Hajri; Mounir Boukadoum; Habib Hamam; Réjean Fontaine
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Effects of ultrasound frequency and tissue stiffness on the histotripsy intrinsic threshold for cavitation.

Authors:  Eli Vlaisavljevich; Kuang-Wei Lin; Adam Maxwell; Matthew T Warnez; Lauren Mancia; Rahul Singh; Andrew J Putnam; Brian Fowlkes; Eric Johnsen; Charles Cain; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.