Literature DB >> 21298433

The influence of cementing technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the initial stability of the femoral component.

Rudi G Bitsch1, Sebastian Jäger, Marcus Lürssen, Travis Loidolt, Thomas P Schmalzried, Stefan Weiss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In clinical and retrieval analyses, over-penetration of cement, incomplete seating of the prosthesis with a resultant polar cement mass, or both, have been associated with early femoral failures of resurfacing arthroplasties. We used human bone specimens to experimentally compare the initial stability of different cementing techniques.
METHODS: Twenty-six pairs of fresh frozen femora were prepared for resurfacing using original instruments (DePuy ASR). ASR femoral resurfacing prostheses were implanted using two different cementing techniques: (1) component filling and (2) cement applicator. Real-time measurements of pressure and temperature during implantation, analyses of cement penetration and micro motions under torque application were performed.
RESULTS: Applicator use reduced significantly the cement penetration depth (9.2 mm vs 5.3 mm with the applicator, p = 0.001), polar mantle (8.1 mm vs 2.6 mm, p = 0.008), cement defects (3.7 mm vs 0.1 mm, p = 0.008) and interface temperatures (40.3°C vs 33.1°C, p < 0.001 ). Initial rotational stability showed statistically significant less extreme values with the cement applicator technique (range 3.4-51.7 m°/Nm, 11.0-29.7 m°/Nm, p = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: The cement applicator technique significantly reduces cement defects, incomplete seating, over-penetration and interface temperatures with a more consistent initial stability of the ASR femoral resurfacing prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21298433      PMCID: PMC3224607          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1212-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing.

Authors:  H S Gill; P A Campbell; D W Murray; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-01

2.  Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rudi G Bitsch; Christian Heisel; Mauricio Silva; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases.

Authors:  F Falez; F Favetti; F Casella; G Panegrossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.

Authors:  J Paige Little; Hans A Gray; David W Murray; David J Beard; Harinderjit Singh Gill
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens.

Authors:  Michael M Morlock; Nick Bishop; Jozef Zustin; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael Amling
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions.

Authors:  M Jasty; C Bragdon; D Burke; D O'Connor; J Lowenstein; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.

Authors:  R M Pilliar; J M Lee; C Maniatopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Bone injury caused by curing bone cement. A vital microscopic study in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; L Linder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Frictional torque in surface and conventional hip replacement.

Authors:  S M Ma; J M Kabo; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  M Halawa; A J Lee; R S Ling; S S Vangala
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1978-08-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cementation and interface analysis of early failure cases after hip-resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Krause; Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael M Morlock; Michael Amling; Jozef Zustin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone Cements Used for Hip Prosthesis Fixation: The Influence of the Handling Procedures on Functional Properties Observed during In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Alina Robu; Robert Ciocoiu; Aurora Antoniac; Iulian Antoniac; Anca Daniela Raiciu; Horatiu Dura; Norin Forna; Mihai Bogdan Cristea; Ioana Dana Carstoc
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Mechanical properties of a cemented porous implant interface.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Joern B Seeger; Matthias Cm Klotz; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.