Literature DB >> 17259409

Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing.

H S Gill1, P A Campbell, D W Murray, K A De Smet.   

Abstract

Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip is being used increasingly as an alternative to total hip replacement, especially for young active patients. There is concern about necrosis of the femoral head after resurfacing which can result in fracture and loosening. Most systems use a cemented femoral component, with the potential for thermal necrosis of the cancellous bone of the reamed femoral head. We used thermal probes to record temperatures close to the cement-bone interface during resurfacing arthroplasty. The maximum temperature recorded at the cement-bone interface in four cases was approximately 68 degrees C which was higher than that reported to kill osteocytes. A modified surgical technique using insertion of a suction cannula into the lesser trochanter, generous pulsed lavage and early reduction of the joint significantly reduced the maximum recorded cancellous bone temperature to approximately 36 degrees C in five cases (p = 0.014). We recommend the modified technique since it significantly reduces temperatures at the cement-bone interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259409     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  17 in total

1.  Cementation and interface analysis of early failure cases after hip-resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Krause; Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael M Morlock; Michael Amling; Jozef Zustin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; R Bader; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Letter to the editor: Association of osteonecrosis and failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arun Kannan; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. What do we know?].

Authors:  R G Bitsch; T P Schmalzried
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2 to 12 years.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The influence of cementing technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the initial stability of the femoral component.

Authors:  Rudi G Bitsch; Sebastian Jäger; Marcus Lürssen; Travis Loidolt; Thomas P Schmalzried; Stefan Weiss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Are There Long-term Benefits to Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Sandeep K Bhaurla
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Association of osteonecrosis and failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jozef Zustin; Guido Sauter; M Michael Morlock; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael Amling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Resurfacing for osteonecrosis of the femoral head].

Authors:  M Akbar; M A Mont; C Heisel; D R Marker; S D Ulrich; T M Seyler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Maximum temperatures of 89°C recorded during the mechanical preparation of 35 femoral heads for resurfacing.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Michael Whitehouse; Michael Kilshaw; Morreica Pabbruwe; Robert Spencer; Ashley Blom; Gordon Bannister
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.