Literature DB >> 18358388

Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.

J Paige Little1, Hans A Gray, David W Murray, David J Beard, Harinderjit Singh Gill.   

Abstract

Hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty with uncemented acetabular and cemented femoral fixation is increasingly becoming popular as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty. There is concern about femoral neck fractures, and long-term survival has not yet been demonstrated. Thermal necrosis may be an important factor for neck fracture and will affect the viability of the femoral bone. This cadaveric study investigated the thermal effect of thick (1.5 mm, n = 3) and thin (0.5 mm, n = 3) cement mantles; 5 thermocouples were used to record temperature at the femoral bone/cement interface during hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The highest recorded temperatures were significantly higher when a thick cement mantle is used (45.4 degrees C), compared to a thin cement mantle (32.7 degrees C). To reduce the potential for thermal necrosis, the thin cement mantle technique is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18358388     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  Cementation and interface analysis of early failure cases after hip-resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Krause; Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael M Morlock; Michael Amling; Jozef Zustin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; R Bader; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The influence of cementing technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the initial stability of the femoral component.

Authors:  Rudi G Bitsch; Sebastian Jäger; Marcus Lürssen; Travis Loidolt; Thomas P Schmalzried; Stefan Weiss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Are There Long-term Benefits to Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Sandeep K Bhaurla
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Association of osteonecrosis and failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jozef Zustin; Guido Sauter; M Michael Morlock; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael Amling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Whole-mount specimens in the analysis of en bloc samples obtained from revisions of resurfacing hip implants. A report of 4 early failures.

Authors:  Ioannis Stogiannidis; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki; Teemu Moilanen; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  [Biomechanical aspects of the implant fixation and kinematics of hip resurfacing systems].

Authors:  R Bader; D Klüss; L Gerdesmeyer; E Steinhauser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Is it Time for Cementless Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

9.  Maximum temperatures of 89°C recorded during the mechanical preparation of 35 femoral heads for resurfacing.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Michael Whitehouse; Michael Kilshaw; Morreica Pabbruwe; Robert Spencer; Ashley Blom; Gordon Bannister
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The effect of surgical approach on the histologyof the femoral head following resurfacing of the hip: Analysis of retrieval specimens.

Authors:  H W Amarasekera; P C Campbell; N Parsons; J Achten; J Masters; D R Griffin; M L Costa
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.853

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.