Literature DB >> 21297472

Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Melissa S Savage1, Mirella J Mourad, Ronald J Wapner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Evaluation of copy number variation by microarray analysis has significant advantages over standard metaphase karyotyping and is quickly becoming the primary means of postnatal genetic evaluation for neonates and infants with dysmorphic features or cognitive difficulties. Before this technology is routinely used for prenatal diagnosis, further evaluation of its value and the clinical dilemmas it may introduce requires further study. This article reviews the recent literature on array technology use in prenatal diagnosis. RECENT
FINDINGS: The use of microarray analysis for routine prenatal diagnosis is still being investigated. Use in certain prenatal situations such as the fetus with structural anomalies or those who are stillborn appears to add important, clinically relevant information. There are a broad range of array designs available and recent research has focused on the appropriate design for prenatal testing. Patient counseling may occasionally be difficult because of the uncertain phenotype associated with some array findings.
SUMMARY: We present a brief overview of microarray technology including benefits and limitations. Previous research regarding use of microarray in prenatal diagnosis including specific scenarios of anomalous fetuses and abnormal karyotype is reviewed. Current guidelines and the authors' recommendations are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21297472      PMCID: PMC4384124          DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834457c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  22 in total

1.  Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis.

Authors:  B H W Faas; I van der Burgt; A J A Kooper; R Pfundt; J Y Hehir-Kwa; A P T Smits; N de Leeuw
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting.

Authors:  Idit Maya; Bella Davidov; Liron Gershovitz; Yael Zalzstein; Ellen Taub; Justine Coppinger; Lisa G Shaffer; Mordechai Shohat
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Application of metaphase HR-CGH and targeted Chromosomal Microarray Analyses to genomic characterization of 116 patients with mental retardation and dysmorphic features.

Authors:  B Nowakowska; P Stankiewicz; E Obersztyn; Z Ou; J Li; A C Chinault; M Smyk; K Borg; T Mazurczak; S W Cheung; E Bocian
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Diagnostic genome profiling in mental retardation.

Authors:  Bert B A de Vries; Rolph Pfundt; Martijn Leisink; David A Koolen; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Irene M Janssen; Simon van Reijmersdal; Willy M Nillesen; Erik H L P G Huys; Nicole de Leeuw; Dominique Smeets; Erik A Sistermans; Ton Feuth; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Han G Brunner; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Ji Hyeon Park; Jung Hoon Woo; Sung Han Shim; Song-Ju Yang; Young Min Choi; Kap-Seok Yang; Dong Hyun Cha
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.103

7.  Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype.

Authors:  Linda Kleeman; Diana W Bianchi; Lisa G Shaffer; Emily Rorem; Janet Cowan; Sabrina D Craigo; Hocine Tighiouart; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Justine Coppinger; Sarah Alliman; Beth A Torchia; Aaron Theisen; Blake C Ballif; Bassem A Bejjani
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Sau Wai Cheung; Patricia Ward; Sandra Darilek; Ankita Patel; Daniela del Gaudio; Sung Hae L Kang; Seema R Lalani; Jiangzhen Li; Sallie McAdoo; Audrey Burke; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; A Craig Chinault; Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Benjamin B Roa; Arthur L Beaudet; Christine M Eng
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients.

Authors:  M De Gregori; R Ciccone; P Magini; T Pramparo; S Gimelli; J Messa; F Novara; A Vetro; E Rossi; P Maraschio; M C Bonaglia; C Anichini; G B Ferrero; M Silengo; E Fazzi; A Zatterale; R Fischetto; C Previderé; S Belli; A Turci; G Calabrese; F Bernardi; E Meneghelli; M Riegel; M Rocchi; S Guerneri; F Lalatta; L Zelante; C Romano; M Fichera; T Mattina; G Arrigo; M Zollino; S Giglio; F Lonardo; A Bonfante; A Ferlini; F Cifuentes; H Van Esch; L Backx; A Schinzel; J R Vermeesch; O Zuffardi
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  13 in total

1.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  22q11.2 deletions in patients with conotruncal defects: data from 1,610 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Philip J Lupo; Jennifer Garbarini; Stacy Woyciechowski; Sharon Edman; Beverly S Emanuel; Laura E Mitchell; Elizabeth Goldmuntz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns.

Authors:  Curtis R Coughlin; Gunter H Scharer; Tamim H Shaikh
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  What women want: lead considerations for current and future applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal care.

Authors:  Ruth M Farrell; Patricia K Agatisa; Benjamin Nutter
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  An economic analysis of prenatal cytogenetic technologies for sonographically detected fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Amelia L M Sutton; Ryan E Longman; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  The scope of prenatal diagnosis for women at increased risk for aneuploidies: views and preferences of professionals and potential users.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Anja Krumeich; Julie Boonekamp; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-11-09

8.  Detection of chromosomal breakpoints in patients with developmental delay and speech disorders.

Authors:  Kagistia H Utami; Axel M Hillmer; Irene Aksoy; Elaine G Y Chew; Audrey S M Teo; Zhenshui Zhang; Charlie W H Lee; Pauline J Chen; Chan Chee Seng; Pramila N Ariyaratne; Sigrid L Rouam; Lim Seong Soo; Saira Yousoof; Ivan Prokudin; Gregory Peters; Felicity Collins; Meredith Wilson; Alyson Kakakios; Georges Haddad; Arnaud Menuet; Olivier Perche; Stacey Kiat Hong Tay; Ken W K Sung; Xiaoan Ruan; Yijun Ruan; Edison T Liu; Sylvain Briault; Robyn V Jamieson; Sonia Davila; Valere Cacheux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Ruth Horn; Michael Parker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.