PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Evaluation of copy number variation by microarray analysis has significant advantages over standard metaphase karyotyping and is quickly becoming the primary means of postnatal genetic evaluation for neonates and infants with dysmorphic features or cognitive difficulties. Before this technology is routinely used for prenatal diagnosis, further evaluation of its value and the clinical dilemmas it may introduce requires further study. This article reviews the recent literature on array technology use in prenatal diagnosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of microarray analysis for routine prenatal diagnosis is still being investigated. Use in certain prenatal situations such as the fetus with structural anomalies or those who are stillborn appears to add important, clinically relevant information. There are a broad range of array designs available and recent research has focused on the appropriate design for prenatal testing. Patient counseling may occasionally be difficult because of the uncertain phenotype associated with some array findings. SUMMARY: We present a brief overview of microarray technology including benefits and limitations. Previous research regarding use of microarray in prenatal diagnosis including specific scenarios of anomalous fetuses and abnormal karyotype is reviewed. Current guidelines and the authors' recommendations are presented.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Evaluation of copy number variation by microarray analysis has significant advantages over standard metaphase karyotyping and is quickly becoming the primary means of postnatal genetic evaluation for neonates and infants with dysmorphic features or cognitive difficulties. Before this technology is routinely used for prenatal diagnosis, further evaluation of its value and the clinical dilemmas it may introduce requires further study. This article reviews the recent literature on array technology use in prenatal diagnosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of microarray analysis for routine prenatal diagnosis is still being investigated. Use in certain prenatal situations such as the fetus with structural anomalies or those who are stillborn appears to add important, clinically relevant information. There are a broad range of array designs available and recent research has focused on the appropriate design for prenatal testing. Patient counseling may occasionally be difficult because of the uncertain phenotype associated with some array findings. SUMMARY: We present a brief overview of microarray technology including benefits and limitations. Previous research regarding use of microarray in prenatal diagnosis including specific scenarios of anomalous fetuses and abnormal karyotype is reviewed. Current guidelines and the authors' recommendations are presented.
Authors: B H W Faas; I van der Burgt; A J A Kooper; R Pfundt; J Y Hehir-Kwa; A P T Smits; N de Leeuw Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: B Nowakowska; P Stankiewicz; E Obersztyn; Z Ou; J Li; A C Chinault; M Smyk; K Borg; T Mazurczak; S W Cheung; E Bocian Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Bert B A de Vries; Rolph Pfundt; Martijn Leisink; David A Koolen; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Irene M Janssen; Simon van Reijmersdal; Willy M Nillesen; Erik H L P G Huys; Nicole de Leeuw; Dominique Smeets; Erik A Sistermans; Ton Feuth; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Han G Brunner; Joris A Veltman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Ji Hyeon Park; Jung Hoon Woo; Sung Han Shim; Song-Ju Yang; Young Min Choi; Kap-Seok Yang; Dong Hyun Cha Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Linda Kleeman; Diana W Bianchi; Lisa G Shaffer; Emily Rorem; Janet Cowan; Sabrina D Craigo; Hocine Tighiouart; Louise E Wilkins-Haug Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Lisa G Shaffer; Justine Coppinger; Sarah Alliman; Beth A Torchia; Aaron Theisen; Blake C Ballif; Bassem A Bejjani Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Trilochan Sahoo; Sau Wai Cheung; Patricia Ward; Sandra Darilek; Ankita Patel; Daniela del Gaudio; Sung Hae L Kang; Seema R Lalani; Jiangzhen Li; Sallie McAdoo; Audrey Burke; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; A Craig Chinault; Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Benjamin B Roa; Arthur L Beaudet; Christine M Eng Journal: Genet Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: M De Gregori; R Ciccone; P Magini; T Pramparo; S Gimelli; J Messa; F Novara; A Vetro; E Rossi; P Maraschio; M C Bonaglia; C Anichini; G B Ferrero; M Silengo; E Fazzi; A Zatterale; R Fischetto; C Previderé; S Belli; A Turci; G Calabrese; F Bernardi; E Meneghelli; M Riegel; M Rocchi; S Guerneri; F Lalatta; L Zelante; C Romano; M Fichera; T Mattina; G Arrigo; M Zollino; S Giglio; F Lonardo; A Bonfante; A Ferlini; F Cifuentes; H Van Esch; L Backx; A Schinzel; J R Vermeesch; O Zuffardi Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Shabnam Peyvandi; Philip J Lupo; Jennifer Garbarini; Stacy Woyciechowski; Sharon Edman; Beverly S Emanuel; Laura E Mitchell; Elizabeth Goldmuntz Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2013-04-21 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Anja Krumeich; Julie Boonekamp; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2012-11-09
Authors: Kagistia H Utami; Axel M Hillmer; Irene Aksoy; Elaine G Y Chew; Audrey S M Teo; Zhenshui Zhang; Charlie W H Lee; Pauline J Chen; Chan Chee Seng; Pramila N Ariyaratne; Sigrid L Rouam; Lim Seong Soo; Saira Yousoof; Ivan Prokudin; Gregory Peters; Felicity Collins; Meredith Wilson; Alyson Kakakios; Georges Haddad; Arnaud Menuet; Olivier Perche; Stacey Kiat Hong Tay; Ken W K Sung; Xiaoan Ruan; Yijun Ruan; Edison T Liu; Sylvain Briault; Robyn V Jamieson; Sonia Davila; Valere Cacheux Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 8.822