Literature DB >> 20577003

Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis.

B H W Faas1, I van der Burgt, A J A Kooper, R Pfundt, J Y Hehir-Kwa, A P T Smits, N de Leeuw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The implementation of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnostics is a topic of discussion, as rare copy number variants with unknown/uncertain clinical consequences are likely to be found. The application of targeted microarrays limits such findings, but the potential disadvantage is that relevant, so far unknown, aberrations might be overlooked. Therefore, we explore the possibilities for the prenatal application of the genome-wide 250k single nucleotide polymorphism array platform.
METHODS: Affymetrix 250k NspI single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA) was performed on DNA from 38 prenatally karyotyped fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Analyses were performed after termination of pregnancy, intrauterine fetal death or birth on DNA isolated from fetal or neonatal material.
RESULTS: Aberrations were detected in 17 of 38 fetuses, 6 of whom with a previously identified chromosomal abnormality and 11 with previously normal or balanced karyotypes. Of the latter, the detected aberration occurred de novo and was considered of clinical relevance in five cases (16%), inherited from a healthy parent in four cases (12%), and de novo yet with unclear clinical relevance in two cases (6%). The clinically relevant abnormalities either were novel copy number variants (n=3) or concerned a uniparental disomy (n=2).
CONCLUSION: In at least 16% of fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and a normal or balanced karyotype, causal (submicroscopic) aberrations were detected, illustrating the importance of the (careful) implementation of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. The fact that the identified, clinically relevant, aberrations would have gone undetected with most targeted approaches underscores the added value of a genome-wide approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20577003     DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2009.075853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  27 in total

Review 1.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow.

Authors:  Malgorzata Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Grétel Oudesluijs; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Govaerts; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  The causality of de novo copy number variants is overestimated.

Authors:  Joris R Vermeesch; Irina Balikova; Connie Schrander-Stumpel; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial.

Authors:  Ronald J Wapner; Deborah A Driscoll; Joe Leigh Simpson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Melissa S Savage; Mirella J Mourad; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.927

9.  Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Ronald J Wapner; Christa Lese Martin; Brynn Levy; Blake C Ballif; Christine M Eng; Julia M Zachary; Melissa Savage; Lawrence D Platt; Daniel Saltzman; William A Grobman; Susan Klugman; Thomas Scholl; Joe Leigh Simpson; Kimberly McCall; Vimla S Aggarwal; Brian Bunke; Odelia Nahum; Ankita Patel; Allen N Lamb; Elizabeth A Thom; Arthur L Beaudet; David H Ledbetter; Lisa G Shaffer; Laird Jackson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  REDBot: Natural language process methods for clinical copy number variation reporting in prenatal and products of conception diagnosis.

Authors:  Mengmeng Liu; Yunshan Zhong; Hongqian Liu; Desheng Liang; Erhong Liu; Yu Zhang; Feng Tian; Qiaowei Liang; David S Cram; Hua Wang; Lingqian Wu; Fuli Yu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.