| Literature DB >> 21293848 |
Rob P A Janssen1, Jasper van der Wijk, Anja Fiedler, Tanja Schmidt, Harm A G M Sala, Sven U Scheffler.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Histological analysis of the remodelling process of human hamstring tendon (HT) grafts after standardized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21293848 PMCID: PMC3136699 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1419-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.342
Demographics (age, gender) of all study groups and KT 1000 results (133 N difference between injured and non-injured leg)
| Age | Gender (m/f) | KT 1000 133 N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (range) | Inj. − Non-inj. | ||||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||||
|
| 28.0 (19–54) |
| 9/6 |
| 0.8 (0.8) |
| <12 months (n = 15) | 31.1 (11.8) | ||||
|
| 25.5 (17–46) | 10/6 | 0.6 (0.7) | ||
| 13–24 months (n = 16) | 27.7 (8.7) | ||||
|
| 29.0 (21–37) | 7/10 | 1.0 (0.8) | ||
| >24 months (n = 11) | 29.0 (6.3) |
Results of all biopsy groups for cellular density, vessel density and myofibroblast density
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | HT control | ACL control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cells/mm² | |||||
| Mean | 736.3 | 789.5 | 718.2 | 327.6 | 535.8 |
| Range | 1550.7 | 1243.5 | 1173.2 | 663.3 | 1545.9 |
| Median | 482.0 | 850.9 | 595.6 | 330.4 | 371.9 |
| SD | 454.1 | 371.1 | 386.9 | 201.6 | 489.4 |
| Vessels/mm² | |||||
| Mean | 17.9 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 11.9 |
| Range | 181.8 | 41.9 | 22.6 | 67.7 | 31.5 |
| Median | 0.0 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 10.1 |
| SD | 47.3 | 10.3 | 8.5 | 15.9 | 9.3 |
| Myofibroblast/mm² | |||||
| Mean | 35.6 | 224.1 | 207.9 | 3.4 | 5.7 |
| Range | 144.7 | 820.6 | 815.0 | 14.6 | 25.7 |
| Median | 11.5 | 199.6 | 97.7 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| SD | 47.3 | 234.4 | 275.3 | 4.4 | 8.9 |
Fig. 1Results of the median cellular density for all biopsy groups. Significant differences between groups 1–3 and native hamstring tendon are illustrated with *
Fig. 2Results of median vessel density for all biopsy groups
Fig. 3Results for median myofibroblast density for all biopsy groups. Myofibroblast density was significantly higher in group 2 (13–24 months) compared with native HT control (marked with *)
Fig. 4Alpha-smooth staining: Group 1 (top left) showed a moderate number of myofibroblasts compared with groups 2 and 3 (right and down). Note an increased number of myofibroblast and vessels in groups 2 and 3
Fig. 5HE staining: hamstring tendon (top left) with regular collagen orientation, moderate cellular density and little fibroblast activity. Group 1 (top right): irregular collagen alignment, increased cellular density, ovoid cell morphology. Group 2. Further increased cellular and vessel density with an irregular collagen orientation (below left). Group 3 (below right): improved regular collagen arrangement