Literature DB >> 20480355

Comparison of tunnel positions in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using computer navigation.

James E Voos1, Volker Musahl, Travis G Maak, Thomas L Wickiewicz, Andrew D Pearle.   

Abstract

Recurrent rotational instability has been identified as a potential source of failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. The aim of the study was to assess whether knee kinematics in the horizontal configuration more closely resemble the intact knee when compared with other single-bundle configurations. Using the Praxim computer navigation system, ACL reconstructions were performed with tibialis anterior grafts in six fresh-frozen whole lower extremity cadaver specimens (12 knees). In each knee, all four reconstruction configurations: conventional (PL tibia to AM femur), anteromedial (AM), posterolateral (PL), and horizontal (AM tibia to PL femur) were performed. Standardized Lachman and pivot shift examinations were performed. For all graft positions during the pivot shift, decreases in the amount of ATT were observed compared with the ACL-deficient state. The knees with grafts placed in the anterior tibial footprint (AM and horizontal) had less ATT with the Lachman and pivot shift maneuvers than knees with grafts placed in the posterior tibial footprint (PL and conventional). A significant difference in depth of impingement was noted only between the AM position and the PL position. Single-bundle ACL reconstructions using graft placement within the anterior footprint on the tibia may reduce rotational instability when compared with more vertical configurations.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20480355     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1162-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  What should the surgeon aim for when performing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Geert Van Damme; Koen Defoort; Yves Ducoulombier; Francis Van Glabbeek; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Sang Hak Lee; Jae Chul Yoo; Hae Chan Ha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Perspectives on computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: movement toward quantitative orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Daniel Kendoff; Volker Musahl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single-bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; James E Voos; Fintan J Shannon; Carinne C Granchi; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  A A Sapega; R A Moyer; C Schneck; N Komalahiranya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions using surgical navigation.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Fintan J Shannon; Carinne Granchi; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. A 5-8-year follow-up.

Authors:  P Aglietti; R Buzzi; F Giron; A J Simeone; G Zaccherotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Simulated pivot-shift testing with single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Samuel Park; Steven R Jackson; David R McAllister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A L Otero; L Hutcheson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  A M J Bull; P H Earnshaw; A Smith; M V Katchburian; A N A Hassan; A A Amis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  Effect of tibial slope on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  James E Voos; Eduardo M Suero; Musa Citak; Frank P Petrigliano; Marianne R F Bosscher; Mustafa Citak; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anteromedial versus central single-bundle graft position: which anatomic graft position to choose?

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Volker Musahl; Asheesh Bedi; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Sommer Hammoud; Eduardo Suero; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The accuracy of bone tunnel position using fluoroscopic-based navigation system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yohei Kawakami; Takafumi Hiranaka; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Yuichi Hida; Tomoaki Fukui; Harunobu Uemoto; Minoru Doita; Mitsuo Tsuji; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  J P van der List; H A Zuiderbaan; D H Nawabi; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael R Carmont; Sven Scheffler; Tim Spalding; Jeremy Brown; Paul M Sutton
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-06

6.  MRI analysis of the attachment of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of anterior cruciate ligament using coronal oblique images.

Authors:  Yoshinari Tanaka; Yoshiki Shiozaki; Yasukazu Yonetani; Takashi Kanamoto; Akira Tsujii; Shuji Horibe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anatomic single-bundle ACL surgery: consequences of tibial tunnel diameter and drill-guide angle on tibial footprint coverage.

Authors:  H Van der Bracht; L Verhelst; B Stuyts; B Page; J Bellemans; P Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Can a tibial tunnel in ACL surgery be placed anatomically without impinging on the femoral notch? A risk factor analysis.

Authors:  H Van der Bracht; J Bellemans; J Victor; L Verhelst; B Page; P Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Quantifying the pivot shift test: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Achtnich; Francesco Ranuccio; Lukas Willinger; Jonas Pogorzelski; Andreas B Imhoff; Sepp Braun; Elmar Herbst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.