Literature DB >> 18183368

"Biological failure" of the anterior cruciate ligament graft.

J Ménétrey1, V B Duthon, T Laumonier, D Fritschy.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has the best chance for success when the graft undergoes extensive biologic remodeling and incorporation after implantation. There are many factors that can lead to graft failure and possible revision surgery. These include patient selection; surgical technique such as graft placement and tensioning; the use of allograft versus autograft; mechanical factors such as secondary restraint laxity; lack of a correct, carefully controlled post-operative rehabilitation program; and biological factors. When a patient presents with knee instability following ligament reconstruction and there is no history of a new trauma or identifiable technical error, biological failure should be considered. However, the biologic response of the grafted tissue is closely linked to the mechanical and biochemical environment into which the graft is placed. Thus, the "biological failure" of the ACL graft is a complex pathological entity whose cause is not fully understood. Failure may be initiated by early extensive graft necrosis, disturbances in revascularization, problems in cell repopulation and proliferation, and as well difficulties in the ligamentization process. However, further study of the biological characterization of a failed graft placed in a correct mechanical environment is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18183368     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0474-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  49 in total

1.  Healing of the patellar tendon autograft after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction--a process of ligamentization? An experimental study in a sheep model.

Authors:  U Bosch; W J Kasperczyk
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of programs administered over 2 different time intervals.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Benjamin S Uh; Robert J Johnson; Joseph A Abate; Claude E Nichols; Braden C Fleming; A Robin Poole; Harald Roos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the biologic basis.

Authors:  J R Corsetti; D W Jackson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vivo study in dogs.

Authors:  S Yoshiya; J T Andrish; M T Manley; T W Bauer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Effect of growth factors on the proliferation of fibroblasts from the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments.

Authors:  C C Schmidt; H I Georgescu; C K Kwoh; G L Blomstrom; C P Engle; L A Larkin; C H Evans; S L Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Patellar tendon and anterior cruciate ligament have different mitogenic responses to platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor beta.

Authors:  K P Spindler; A K Imro; C E Mayes; J M Davidson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  M H Getelman; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Changes in synovial fluid cytokine and keratan sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  M Cameron; A Buchgraber; H Passler; M Vogt; E Thonar; F Fu; C H Evans
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  P F Holmes; S L James; R L Larson; K M Singer; D C Jones
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Origin of replacement cells for the anterior cruciate ligament autograft.

Authors:  J B Kleiner; D Amiel; R D Roux; W H Akeson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  52 in total

1.  A novel device to apply controlled flexion and extension to the rat knee following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark E Stasiak; Dan Wiznia; Saif Alzoobaee; Michael C Ciccotti; Carl W Imhauser; Clifford Voigt; Peter A Torzilli; Xiang-Hua Deng; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Bone morphogenetic protein-7 enhances bone-tendon integration in a murine in vitro co-culture model.

Authors:  Tim Schwarting; Michael Benölken; Steffen Ruchholtz; Michael Frink; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The reharvested patellar tendon has the potential for ligamentization when used for anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Sven Stener; Lars Ejerhed; Tomas Movin; Ninni Sernert; Nikos Papadogiannakis; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Graft size after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel Hensler; Motoko Miyawaki; Kenneth D Illingworth; Carola F van Eck; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Patient demographics and surgical characteristics in ACL revision: a comparison of French, Norwegian, and North American cohorts.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Christophe Trojani; Lars-Petter Granan; Philippe Neyret; Philippe Colombet; Lars Engebretsen; Rick W Wright; Christopher C Kaeding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Jüri Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Jón Karlsson; Ninni Sernert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  ACL rupture and joint laxity progression: a quantitative in vivo analysis.

Authors:  C Signorelli; G Filardo; T Bonanzinga; A Grassi; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Synovialization on second-look arthroscopy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles allograft in active young men.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Bo Gyu Yang; Young Hak Roh; Jun Suk Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Analysis of sequential cytokine release after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  A L Hayward; D J Deehan; R M Aspden; A G Sutherland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Alberto Grassi; Margherita Serra; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.