Literature DB >> 24474586

Signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after allograft double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Motoko Miyawaki1, Daniel Hensler, Kenneth D Illingworth, James J Irrgang, Freddie H Fu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) graft signal intensity after allograft double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and determine the relationship between signal intensity and time from surgery.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients with an intact graft on MRI after anatomic allograft DB ACL reconstruction up to 1 year post-operatively were included. All subjects underwent post-operative MRI using a 1.5-T magnet. Sagittal proton density-weighted images (PDWI) and sagittal T2-weighted images (T2WI) were analysed. Using the region-of-interest (ROI) function on imaging software, the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the graft and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) were outlined. Mean signal intensity of the three ROIs were recorded as absolute signal intensity. Signal intensity (SI ratio) was calculated based on the signal intensity of the PCL. Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between signal intensity and time from surgery.
RESULTS: SI ratio of the PL bundle was higher than that of the AM bundle for both the PDWI (1.7 ± 1.5 vs. 2.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.05) and T2WI (1.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.05). There were weak correlations between AM SI ratio and time from surgery (r = 0.38, p < 0.05 on PDWI), and moderate correlations between PL SI ratio and time from surgery (r = 0.43, p < 0.05 on PDWI) (r = 0.44, p < 0.05 on T2WI).
CONCLUSIONS: The PL bundle displayed increased signal intensity compared to the AM bundle and based on previous studies may indicate a longer healing process. Plain MRI may be useful to assess graft healing after ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474586     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2856-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Joshua G Schkrohowsky; Zachary M Working; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Can the pivot-shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Costanza Musiani; Papakonstantinou Vassilis; Marco Nitri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation. A preliminary study.

Authors:  S M Howell; J A Clark; R D Blasier
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  The biology of integration of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  D J Deehan; T E Cawston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

5.  Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy.

Authors:  Mark Pallis; Steven J Svoboda; Kenneth L Cameron; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The effects of in situ freezing on the anterior cruciate ligament. An experimental study in goats.

Authors:  D W Jackson; E S Grood; B T Cohn; S P Arnoczky; T M Simon; J F Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Magnetic resonance evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament repair using the patellar tendon double bone block technique.

Authors:  G Autz; C Goodwin; R D Singson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  MRI of anterior cruciate ligament healing.

Authors:  H Ihara; M Miwa; K Deya; K Torisu
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Evaluation of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R M Maywood; B J Murphy; J W Uribe; K S Hechtman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  In Situ, noninvasive, T2*-weighted MRI-derived parameters predict ex vivo structural properties of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or bioenhanced primary repair in a porcine model.

Authors:  Alison M Biercevicz; Daniel L Miranda; Jason T Machan; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  5 in total

1.  Tibial ACL insertion site length: correlation between preoperative MRI and intra-operative measurements.

Authors:  Harald K Widhalm; Levent Surer; Nikhil Kurapati; Claudia Guglielmino; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Superior graft maturation after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transtibial drilling technique compared to the transportal technique.

Authors:  Masahiko Saito; Arata Nakajima; Masato Sonobe; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yorikazu Akatsu; Tsutomu Inaoka; Junichi Iwasaki; Tsuguo Morikawa; Atsuya Watanabe; Yasuchika Aoki; Takahisa Sasho; Koichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Ryo Kanto; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Philip Zakko; Carola F van Eck; Daniel Guenther; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Correlation Analysis of Potential Factors Influencing Graft Maturity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hong Li; Shuang Chen; Hongyue Tao; Hongyun Li; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.