Literature DB >> 21291963

The role of context in risky choice.

Stephen F Meyer1, Dan R Schley, Edmund Fantino.   

Abstract

Human choice behavior was assessed in a concurrent-chain schedule, where two equal initial links (IL) each led to a distinct terminal-link (TL). One TL was associated with a fixed ratio schedule of reinforcement, while the other was associated with a bi-valued mixed ratio schedule of reinforcement, whose arithmetic mean equaled the Fixed TL schedule. The fixed component (FR50; FR25; FR5) was arranged to be equal to the alternative mixed component in each condition (FR1/99; FR1/49; FR1/9), and choice behavior was measured by proportion of responses to each IL. In addition, the IL duration varied across conditions (VI 30s; VI 15s; FI 1s). Preference for the mixed option was observed with longer durations (e.g., when IL=VI 30s and TL=FR1/99). Participants were relatively indifferent in other conditions, though the results suggested a monotonic increase in preference as either durations or programmed efforts increased. It is concluded that both choice and the conditioned reinforcement value of the mixed option is contextually based, so that the value of a stimulus correlated with an immediate reward (i.e., FR 1) is enhanced the greater the temporal context in which the FR1 is embedded. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21291963      PMCID: PMC3081381          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice.

Authors:  Ralph Hertwig; Greg Barron; Elke U Weber; Ido Erev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-08

3.  Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Cicerone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some factors controlling preference between fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Sherman; J R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes.

Authors:  L Green; N Fristoe; J Myerson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-09

8.  Choice for aperiodic versus periodic ratio schedules: A comparison of concurrent and concurrent-chain procedures.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Preferences for constant duration delays and constant sized rewards in human subjects.

Authors:  A Kohn; W K Kohn; J E Staddon
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-06-03       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Preference and switching under ratio contingencies with humans.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1966-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.