Literature DB >> 21290107

Secondary patellar resurfacing in the treatment of patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty.

E Muñoz-Mahamud1, D Popescu, E Nuñez, L M Lozano, M Nuñez, S Sastre, P Torner, J M Segur, F Maculé.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper reports a prospective review of patients who, between 2004 and 2007, underwent secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) due to anterior knee pain after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim was to evaluate the clinical outcomes obtained with the SPR and to compare them with radiological findings.
METHODS: A total of twenty-seven consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. There were twenty-three (85%) women and four (15%) men with a median age of 70 years. The patients were evaluated before and after the surgery with the same functional scores and radiological parameters. Bone scintigraphy was also used in the assessment, and a CT-scan was performed in order to evaluate the femoral component rotation. The median time between TKA and SPR was 18 months.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 23 months, seventeen patients (63%) reported a clear subjective improvement after SPR, and patellofemoral scores (primary outcome measure), KSS and WOMAC (secondary outcome measures) showed a statistically significant improvement following the procedure. There were no significant changes after SPR in the Insall-Salvati ratio, the lateral patellar displacement or the lateral patellar tilt. The mean time between TKA and SPR had no statistically significant effect on outcome. The bone scintigraphy revealed increased patellar uptake in seven cases, but this was not related to subsequent improvement after SPR. Rotational computed tomography showed a median internal rotation of the femoral component of 1º. The complications observed were a patellar component loosening and an acute post-infection.
CONCLUSION: No clinical or radiological parameter was found to be related to the final outcome after SPR. There was a discrepancy between functional scale scores and the patient's subjective satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21290107     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1402-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C W Olcott; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The consequences of not resurfacing the patella.

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; R Stephen J Burnett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal of the available evidence.

Authors:  Vittorio Calvisi; Gianluca Camillieri; Stefano Lupparelli
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Patellar resurfacing versus no resurfacing in Scorpio total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N Garneti; D Mahadeva; A Khalil; C A N McLaren
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Venkat R Rapuri; Khaled J Saleh; Michael A Kuskowski; Peter F Sharkey; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; M W Wolfe
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H E Muoneke; A M Khan; K A Giannikas; E Hägglund; T H Dunningham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-07

Review 8.  The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G W Brick; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Results of resurfacing a native patella in patients with a painful total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Michael Codsi; Benjamin Bierbaum
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R A Berger; L S Crossett; J J Jacobs; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Causes of failure and etiology of painful primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Romain Seil; Dietrich Pape
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Secondary patellar resurfacing following total knee arthroplasty : A cohort study in fifty eight knees with a mean follow-up of thirty one months.

Authors:  Philip Scheurer; Inge H F Reininga; Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty: clinical pathway and review of the literature].

Authors:  H-R Springorum; B Rath; C Baier; P Lechler; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Predictors for secondary patellar resurfacing after primary total knee arthroplasty using a "patella-friendly" total knee arthroplasty system.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Randa Moussa; Cornelius Jacobs; Karl F Schüttler; Thomas Stein; Frank A Schildberg; Dieter C Wirtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months.

Authors:  Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Gebhart Meidinger; Philip B Schöttle; Matthias Cotic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Patellar morphology and femoral component geometry influence patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing.

Authors:  Atsushi Takahashi; Hirotaka Sano; Masahiro Ohnuma; Mitsuhiro Kashiwaba; Daisuke Chiba; Masayuki Kamimura; Takehiko Sugita; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Prospective clinical and radiological two-year results after patellofemoral arthroplasty using an implant with an asymmetric trochlea design.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Philip B Schöttle; Matthias Cotic; Vyas Dharmesh; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Less anterior knee pain with a routine lateral release in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Guo-Chun Zha; Jun-Ying Sun; Sheng-Jie Dong
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [Radiological findings, evaluation and treatment of patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  H-R Springorum; A Keshmiri; G Heers; T Renkawitz; J Grifka; C Baier
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  The predictive factors of secondary patellar resurfacing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Florent Franck; Hervé Ouanezar; Alexandre Jacquel; Vincent Pibarot; Julien Wegrzyn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.