Literature DB >> 22086222

Patellar morphology and femoral component geometry influence patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing.

Atsushi Takahashi1, Hirotaka Sano, Masahiro Ohnuma, Mitsuhiro Kashiwaba, Daisuke Chiba, Masayuki Kamimura, Takehiko Sugita, Eiji Itoi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of patellar morphology and implant design on patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing.
METHODS: Radiographic investigation: One hundred and fifty-seven knees of 127 patients were included in the study. Implants used in the present series were Low Contact Stress (LCS), Genesis II and NexGen. The relationship between the pre-operative patellar facet angle and newly identified post-operative osteosclerosis was assessed. Finite element analysis: Using patient-specific patellar three-dimensional finite element models, the relationship between the patellar facet angle and mean von Mises stress within the patella was calculated at flexion angles of 15°, 45°, 75° and 105°.
RESULTS: Radiographic investigation: Post-operative osteosclerosis was observed with decreasing patellar facet angle in the Genesis II (odds ratio = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.93; P = 0.012) and NexGen implants (odds ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.99; P = 0.029). Patients treated with the Genesis II had significantly more advanced osteosclerosis than those treated with the other two implants. Finite element analysis: A negative correlation was found between the patellar facet angle and the mean von Mises stress for all three implants. The Genesis II showed significantly higher von Mises stress than the other two implants at flexion angles of 15°, 45° and 105°.
CONCLUSIONS: Both patellar morphology and femoral component geometry influence patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case control study, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22086222     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1768-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  The influence of malrotation of the femoral component in total knee replacement on the mechanics of patellofemoral contact during gait: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  C Verlinden; P Uvin; L Labey; J P Luyckx; J Bellemans; H Vandenneucker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-05

2.  Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilios E Pakos; Evangelia E Ntzani; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement.

Authors:  H-M Ma; Y-C Lu; T-G Kwok; F-Y Ho; C-Y Huang; C-H Huang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-03

4.  In vivo assessment of lumbar vertebral strength in elderly women using computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element model.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai; Isao Ohnishi; Seizo Yamamoto; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Patellofemoral pressure after TKA in vitro: highly conforming vs. posterior stabilized inlays.

Authors:  Thomas Jan Heyse; Christoph Becher; Nadine Kron; Sven Ostermeier; Christof Hurschler; Markus D Schofer; Carsten O Tibesku; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients.

Authors:  Naohiro Sawaguchi; Tokifumi Majima; Takayuki Ishigaki; Noriaki Mori; Takashi Terashima; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.

Authors:  J H Keyak; S A Rossi; K A Jones; H B Skinner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The influences of biomechanical factors on cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy for knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis: clinical and arthroscopic observations.

Authors:  Takeshi Kanamiya; Masatoshi Naito; Michiya Hara; Ichiro Yoshimura
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Patellar resurfacing compared with nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A concise follow-up of a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Julienne L Boone; Seth D Rosenzweig; Karen Steger-May; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The outerbridge classification predicts the need for patellar resurfacing in TKA.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  11 in total

1.  Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Ting-Kuo Chang; Tai-Yuan Chuang; Shih-Liang Shih; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus preservation in high flexion total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Du Hyun Ro; Yool Cho; Young Min Lee; Kee Yun Chung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  External rotation of the femoral component decreases patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Terashima; Tomohiro Onodera; Naohiro Sawaguchi; Yasuhiko Kasahara; Tokifumi Majima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Does patellofemoral congruence following total knee arthroplasty correlate with pain or function? Intraoperative arthroscopic assessment of 30 cases.

Authors:  Antoine Senioris; Mo Saffarini; Said Rahali; Louis Malekpour; Franck Dujardin; Olivier Courage
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08

5.  The need for secondary resurfacing is affected by trochlear height in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lucas Werth; Mo Saffarini; Felix Amsler; Ashraf Abdelkafy; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Early results of gender-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing].

Authors:  P von Roth; G Matziolis; T Pfitzner; H O Mayr; T Klein; B Preininger; T Winkler; R Hube
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Biomechanical research on effects of pseudo-patella baja on stress of patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Wenxing Wei; Yong Nie; Yuangang Wu; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-07-15

8.  Influence of Different Patellofemoral Design Variations Based on Genesis II Total Knee Endoprosthesis on Patellofemoral Pressure and Kinematics.

Authors:  Ulf G Leichtle; Barbara Lange; Yvonne Herzog; Peter Schnauffer; Carmen I Leichtle; Nikolaus Wülker; Andrea Lorenz
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.781

9.  Surface Area of Patellar Facets: Inferential Statistics in the Iraqi Population.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Imam; Zaid Al-Zamili; Rawan Omar
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2017-02-28

10.  Relation of the chondromalatia patellae to proximal tibial anatomical parameters, assessed with MRI.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Tabary; Azadehsadat Esfahani; Mehdi Nouraie; Mohammad Reza Babaei; Ali Reza Khoshdel; Farnaz Araghi; Mostafa Shahrezaee
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.