Literature DB >> 21286291

Laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer.

Govind Nandakumar1, James W Fleshman.   

Abstract

Laparoscopy has emerged as a useful tool in the surgical treatment of diseases of the colon and rectum. Specifically, in the application of colon cancer, a laparoscopic-assisted approach offers short-term benefits to patients while maintaining a long-term oncologic outcome. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery may help decrease operative times while preserving the benefits of laparoscopy. The literature on the use of laparoscopy for rectal cancer is still in its early stages. Limited data suggest short-term benefits without compromising oncologic outcome; however, data from large multicenter trials will clarify the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal cancer. Robotic proctectomy is a novel technique that may offer considerable advantage and overcome some limitations laparoscopy creates while working in the confines of the pelvis. The improved magnification and visualization offered with the robot may also assist in preserving bladder and sexual function. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for the treatment of T1 rectal cancers with low-risk features appears to be safe. However, TEM has a significantly higher recurrence rate when used to treat invasive cancer. Endoluminal techniques and equipment are under development and could offer more minimally invasive approaches to the treatment of colon and rectal cancer. Credentialing and training of surgeons and teams involved in the use of laparoscopy is important prior to making these techniques ubiquitous.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; laparoscopy; rectal cancer

Year:  2010        PMID: 21286291      PMCID: PMC2850167          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  59 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy D Jackson; Gilaad G Kaplan; Goffredo Arena; John H Page; Selwyn O Rogers
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The influence of histopathologic criteria on the long-term prognosis of locally excised pT1 rectal carcinomas: results of local excision (transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and immediate reoperation.

Authors:  Thomas Borschitz; Achim Heintz; Theodor Junginger
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Bretagnol; B Lelong; C Laurent; V Moutardier; A Rullier; G Monges; J-R Delpero; E Rullier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon S M Ng; Ka Lau Leung; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Jimmy C M Li; Anthony Y B Teoh; Wing Wa Leung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation.

Authors:  Howard M Ross; Clifford L Simmang; James W Fleshman; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.058

View more
  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for cancer: how patient selection and complications differ by approach.

Authors:  David B Stewart; Christopher Hollenbeak; Melissa Boltz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.