Literature DB >> 21909844

Laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for cancer: how patient selection and complications differ by approach.

David B Stewart1, Christopher Hollenbeak, Melissa Boltz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes between laparoscopic (LAPR) and open abdominoperineal resections (OAPR) are poorly described.
METHODS: After IRB approval, 2005-2008 NSQIP data were used to identify patients undergoing LAPR and OAPR for rectal cancer. Logistic regression identified variables influencing the selection of LAPR vs. OAPR as well as the likelihood of postoperative events. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the incidence of 30-day postoperative events.
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred ninety-seven OAPRs and 143 LAPRs were identified. LAPRs were less likely to have a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 (p = 0.04) and were associated with equivalent mean operative times (p = 0.36). LAPRs and OAPRs were found to have similar rates of surgical site infections (p = 0.13), transfusion requirements (p = 0.17), myocardial infarction (p = 0.48), and need for reoperation within 30 days (p = 0.20). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy did not directly increase complication rates in either group. Few factors predicted choice of LAPR but included BMI <25 (OR, 1.54; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Complication rates between LAPR and OAPR were similar despite the greater technical challenge of LAPR. Wound infection rates were equivalent, which may reflect similar rates of perineal wound infections. Few patients are offered LAPR, possibly due to surgeon preferance as opposed to patient factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909844     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1663-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  23 in total

1.  Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients.

Authors:  M T Eriksen; A Wibe; J Norstein; J Haffner; J N Wiig
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

3.  Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Masui; H Ike; S Yamaguchi; S Oki; H Shimada
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients.

Authors:  S Delgado; D Momblán; L Salvador; R Bravo; A Castells; A Ibarzabal; J M Piqué; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

7.  Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy W C Ho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; N D Karanjia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Manfred Odermatt; Karen Flashman; Jim Khan; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Case-matched comparison of the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Inada; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Taihei Oshiro; Masashi Takawa; Shin Fujita; Takayuki Akasu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections.

Authors:  Yoen Tk van der Linden; Doeke Boersma; Koop Bosscha; Daniel J Lips; Hubert A Prins
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.