Literature DB >> 16897336

The influence of histopathologic criteria on the long-term prognosis of locally excised pT1 rectal carcinomas: results of local excision (transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and immediate reoperation.

Thomas Borschitz1, Achim Heintz, Theodor Junginger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Local excision of early rectal cancer is a controversial issue, which is in part because of differences in the evaluation of histopathologic criteria. This prospective study was designed to determine prognostic factors for recurrences and the need for reoperation.
METHODS: In 105 of 118 patients with pT1 carcinomas and local excision, results of recurrence rates and ten-year cancer-free survival were studied separately according to different histologic criteria (R0, R1, Rx, R < or = 1 mm, high-/low-risk situation), tumor localization (anterior, posterior, lateral wall and third of rectum), size, and degree of resection (full-thickness/partial wall). Patients were grouped into local excision (n = 89) and local excision followed by reoperation (n = 21). Risk classification was performed by division into "low-risk" carcinomas after local R0-resection (Group A) and unfavorable histologic results after local resection (R1, Rx, R < or = 1 mm, high-risk situation; Group B).
RESULTS: Local recurrence rates after local R0-resection of low-risk carcinomas were 6 percent, whereas patients in Group B with local resection were 39 percent. The recurrence risk in those patients was significantly reduced to 6 percent by reoperation (P = 0.015). In addition, ten-year, cancer-free survival was 93 percent in Group B after reoperation compared with 89 percent in patients of Group A after local excision alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Local R0-resection in cases with low-risk pT1 carcinomas represents an oncologically adequate therapy, which results in similar survival rates compared with primary radical surgery of pT1N0M0 rectal carcinomas. High recurrence rates are observed in tumors with unfavorable histologic result (Group B) requiring further treatment. In these cases immediate reoperation reduces the recurrence rate to 6 percent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897336     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0587-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  39 in total

1.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Jose M Ramirez; Vicente Aguilella; Javier Valencia; Javier Ortego; Jose A Gracia; Pilar Escudero; Ricardo Esco; Mariano Martinez
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Theodore John Saclarides
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

3.  Functional and clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection for the treatment of patients with t1 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Jakub Kenig; Piotr Richter; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

Review 5.  [Surgery for rectal cancer].

Authors:  C J Krones; M Stumpf; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  When less is more, when less is less: local excision in early rectal cancer.

Authors:  Joshua E Meyer; David L Sherr
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05

Review 7.  Local Excision and Endoscopic Resections for Early Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Guilherme Pagin São Julião; Juan Pablo Celentano; Flavia Andrea Alexandre; Bruna Borba Vailati
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 8.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or oncological compromise.

Authors:  Gunnar Baatrup; Thomas Borschitz; Christoffer Cunningham; Niels Qvist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Salvage TME following TEM: a possible indication for TaTME.

Authors:  F Letarte; M Raval; A Karimuddin; P T Phang; C J Brown
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.