Literature DB >> 21282761

A multicentre study of the long-term results of using a flat-back polyethylene glenoid component in shoulder replacement for primary osteoarthritis.

A Young1, G Walch, P Boileau, L Favard, F Gohlke, M Loew, D Molé.   

Abstract

We report the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of the Aequalis total shoulder replacement with a cemented all-polyethylene flat-back keeled glenoid component implanted for primary osteoarthritis between 1991 and 2003 in nine European centres. A total of 226 shoulders in 210 patients were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 122.7 months (61 to 219) or at revision. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Constant score, patient satisfaction score and range of movement. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with glenoid revision for loosening and radiological glenoid loosening (SD) as endpoints. The Constant score was found to improve from a mean of 26.8 (SD 10.3) pre-operatively to 57.6 (SD 20.0) post-operatively (p < 0.001). Active forward flexion improved from a mean of 85.3° (SD 27.4) pre-operatively to 125° (SD 37.3) postoperatively (p < 0.001). External rotation improved from a mean of 7° (SD 6.5) pre-operatively to 30.3° (SD 21.8°) post-operatively (p < 0.001). Survivorship with revision of the glenoid component as the endpoint was 99.1% at five years, 94.5% at ten years and 79.4% at 15 years. Survivorship with radiological loosening as the endpoint was 99.1% at five years, 80.3% at ten years and 33.6% at 15 years. Younger patient age and the curettage technique for glenoid preparation correlated with loosening. The rate of glenoid revision and radiological loosening increased with duration of follow-up, but not until a follow-up of five years. Therefore, we recommend that future studies reporting radiological outcomes of new glenoid designs should report follow-up of at least five to ten years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282761     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  30 in total

1.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  M O Gauci; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; M Baba; G Walch; P Boileau
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Results of cementless humeral head resurfacing with cemented glenoid components.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; Manuela Weiter; Boris Sowa; Felix Zeifang; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Shoulder endoprosthesis in the elderly : Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty? Anatomic or reverse?]

Authors:  J Kircher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Evaluation of thirty eight cemented pegged glenoid components with variable backside curvature: two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Florence Dauzère; Marine Arboucalot; Julie Lebon; Fanny Elia; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Superior glenoid inclination and glenoid bone loss : Definition, assessment, biomechanical consequences, and surgical options.

Authors:  L Favard; J Berhouet; G Walch; J Chaoui; C Lévigne
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  National trends and perioperative outcomes in primary and revision total shoulder arthroplasty: Trends in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian E Schwartz; David D Savin; Ari R Youderian; David Mossad; Benjamin A Goldberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad?

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Winston J Warme; Sarah E Jackins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  [Periprosthetic humeral fractures: Strategies and techniques of revision arthroplasty].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; M Beirer; U Brunner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.