Literature DB >> 26992713

[Periprosthetic humeral fractures: Strategies and techniques of revision arthroplasty].

C Kirchhoff1, M Beirer2, U Brunner3.   

Abstract

The primary aims when performing revision arthroplasty of periprosthetic humeral fractures (PHF) are preservation of bone stock, achieving fracture healing and preserving a stable prosthesis with the focus on regaining the preoperative shoulder-arm function. The indications for revision arthroplasty are given in PHF in combination with loosening of the stem. In addition, further factors must be independently clarified in the case of an anatomical arthroplasty. In this context secondary glenoid erosion as well as rotator cuff insufficiency are potential factors for an extended revision procedure. For the performance of revision surgery modular revision sets including long stems, revision glenoid and metaglene components as well as plate and cerclage systems are obligatory besides the explantation instrumentation. Despite a loosened prosthesis, a transhumeral removal of the stem along with a subpectoral fenestration are often required. Length as well as bracing of revision stems need to bridge the fracture by at least twice the humeral diameter. Moreover, in many cases a combined procedure using an additional distal open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) plus cable cerclages as well as biological augmentation might be needed. Assuming an adequate preparation, the experienced surgeon is able to achieve a high fracture union rate along with an acceptable or even good shoulder function and to avoid further complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Complication; Long stem prosthesis; Osteoporosis; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26992713     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-016-0158-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  20 in total

1.  Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G M Gartsman; T S Roddey; S M Hammerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  J W Sperling; R H Cofield; S W O'Driscoll; M E Torchia; C M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Revision total joint arthroplasty: the epidemiology of 63,140 cases in New York State.

Authors:  Ankit Bansal; Omar N Khatib; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder and elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Greiner; V Stein; M Scheibel
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.531

5.  [Strategies in revision shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  P Habermeyer; P Magosch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Revision surgery of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Barbara Melis; David Duperron; Grégory Moineau; Adam P Rumian; Yung Han
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Utility and complications of long-stem humeral components in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Owens; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Revision arthroplasty with use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis-allograft composite.

Authors:  Ariel Chacon; Nazeem Virani; Robert Shannon; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello; Mark Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A J van de Sande; R Brand; P M Rozing
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  [Shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of the sequelae of proximal humerus fractures].

Authors:  U Brunner; S Köhler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.004

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Conservative treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures years after cemented fracture prostheses : A case series].

Authors:  H Siekmann; T S Bowen; M Huschak; F Radetzki; C Bauer; J Walther
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Inadvertent, intraoperative, non- to minimally displaced periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures in RTSA do not affect the clinical and radiographic short-term outcome.

Authors:  Anita Hasler; Philipp Kriechling; Caroline Passaplan; Karl Wieser
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.