Literature DB >> 31152346

Disparity of Colon Cancer Outcomes in Rural America: Making the Case to Travel the Extra Mile.

Vignesh Raman1, Mohamed A Adam2, Megan C Turner3, Harvey G Moore3, Christopher R Mantyh3, John Migaly3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rural patients experience disparities in cancer care compared to urban patients. We hypothesized that rural patients with colon cancer who traveled to high-volume centers for treatment have similar survival compared to urban patients who also traveled to high-volume centers to seek treatment for colon cancer.
METHODS: The National Cancer Database was interrogated for patients treated for stage I-III colon cancer (2004-2015). Travel distance to treatment centers and annual hospital volume were divided into quartiles. Two groups of patients were identified and compared: (1) rural patients who traveled to high-volume hospitals and (2) urban patients who also traveled to high-volume centers. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Of 647,949 patients, 634, 447 were urban and 13,502 were rural. Rural patients were more likely to be Caucasian, with lower income, more comorbidities, and be treated at non-academic centers. In multivariable analysis, rural patients had worse OS compared to urban patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.12; p = < 0.001). There were 46,781 (7%) urban patients and 1276 (9%) rural patients who traveled a long distance (median 40 and 108 miles, respectively) to high-volume centers. There was no difference in adjusted OS between urban and rural patients who traveled to high-volume centers for treatment (HR 1.06; 95%CI 0.94-1.20; p = 0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide analysis suggests that rural patients with colon cancer experience worse survival than urban patients, but that this disparity might be mitigated by rural patients traveling to high-volume centers for treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Disparities; Rural; Urban

Year:  2019        PMID: 31152346     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04270-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  26 in total

1.  A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.

Authors:  J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark P Doescher; Anthony F Jerant; L Gary Hart
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Geographic remoteness, area-level socio-economic disadvantage and advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional, multilevel study.

Authors:  Peter D Baade; Gavin Turrell; Joanne F Aitken
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2009.

Authors:  John R Pleis; Brian W Ward; Jacqueline W Lucas
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 10       Date:  2010-12

4.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Rural v. urban aspects of cancer: first-year data from the Mississippi Central Cancer Registry.

Authors:  J C Higginbotham; J Moulder; M Currier
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2001-07

6.  The late-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer: demographic and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; H Andrews; R Kao; R Wallace; J Kerner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization.

Authors:  S R Finlayson; J D Birkmeyer; A N Tosteson; R F Nease
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Yating Sun; Sandra L Wong; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Nancy J Marth; David C Goodman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis. Possible relationship to cancer screening.

Authors:  J M Liff; W H Chow; R S Greenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

2.  Association of Rurality, Race and Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status With the Surgical Management of Colon Cancer and Postoperative Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Niveditta Ramkumar; Carrie H Colla; Qianfei Wang; A James O'Malley; Sandra L Wong; Gabriel A Brooks
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

3.  Association between urbanicity and surgical treatment among patients with primary glioblastoma in the United States.

Authors:  Gino Cioffi; David J Cote; Quinn T Ostrom; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-01-08

4.  ctDNA MRD Detection and Personalized Oncogenomic Analysis in Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer From Plasma and Urine.

Authors:  Bruna Pellini; Nadja Pejovic; Wenjia Feng; Noah Earland; Peter K Harris; Abul Usmani; Jeffrey J Szymanski; Faridi Qaium; Jacqueline Mudd; Marvin Petty; Yuqiu Jiang; Ashla Singh; Christopher A Maher; Lauren E Henke; Haeseong Park; Matthew A Ciorba; Hyun Kim; Matthew G Mutch; Katrina S Pedersen; Benjamin R Tan; William G Hawkins; Ryan C Fields; Aadel A Chaudhuri
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.