Literature DB >> 21281174

BEME Guide No. 1: Best Evidence Medical Education.

R M Harden, Janet Grant, Graham Buckley, I R Hart.   

Abstract

There is a need to move from opinion-based education to evidence-based education. Best evidence medical education (BEME) is the implementation, by teachers in their practice, of methods and approaches to education based on the best evidence available. It involves a professional judgement by the teacher about his/her teaching taking into account a number of factors-the QUESTS dimensions. The Quality of the research evidence available-how reliable is the evidence? the Utility of the evidence-can the methods be transferred and adopted without modification, the Extent of the evidence, the Strength of the evidence, the Target or outcomes measured-how valid is the evidence? and the Setting or context-how relevant is the evidence? The evidence available can be graded on each of the six dimensions. In the ideal situation the evidence is high on all six dimensions, but this is rarely found. Usually the evidence may be good in some respects, but poor in others.The teacher has to balance the different dimensions and come to a decision on a course of action based on his or her professional judgement.The QUESTS dimensions highlight a number of tensions with regard to the evidence in medical education: quality vs. relevance; quality vs. validity; and utility vs. the setting or context. The different dimensions reflect the nature of research and innovation. Best Evidence Medical Education encourages a culture or ethos in which decision making takes place in this context.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 21281174     DOI: 10.1080/01421599978960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  53 in total

1.  The establishment and roles of the Medical Education Department in the faculty of Medicine, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Lana A Al Shawwa
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2012-01

2.  Deconstructing quality in education research.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-06

3.  Manikin-based clinical simulation in chiropractic education.

Authors:  Marion McGregor; Dominic Giuliano
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Trends and the future of postgraduate medical education.

Authors:  R M Harden
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Shared learning in the National Health Service.

Authors:  Howard Skinner
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969-2007.

Authors:  Amy Baernstein; Hillary K Liss; Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Why Are Medical Education Literature Reviews So Hard to Do?

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-10

8.  Development of perceived pharmacological deficits of medical students and alumni supports claim for continuous and more application-oriented education.

Authors:  Wencke Johannsen; Bernhard Frings; Stefan Herzig; Jan Matthes
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Getting off the "gold standard": randomized controlled trials and education research.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

10.  Redefining Quality in Medical Education Research: A Consumer's View.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan; Deborah Simpson; David A Cook; Nicole M DeIorio; Kathryn Andolsek; Lawrence Opas; Ingrid Philibert; Lalena M Yarris
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.