CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that electric acoustic stimulation (EAS(®)) using the FLEX(EAS) electrode is a successful treatment method for preservation and stability of low frequency hearing, and results in significant improvements in speech perception. OBJECTIVES: Low frequency hearing preservation and stability following EAS surgery with the MED-EL PULSARCI(100) implant using the FLEX(EAS) electrode and a combined processor in a multicentre setting, and the efficacy and benefits of EAS over time were evaluated. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with normal to moderate hearing loss in the low frequencies and severe to profound hearing loss in the high frequencies were implanted with the FLEX(EAS) electrode. Implantation was performed by different surgeons at three participating centres using either the cochleostomy or the round window approach. Preoperatively, hearing was measured; a battery of speech perception tests and the subjective benefit questionnaire were administered. These tests were subsequently repeated: first at EAS fitting, which was due 3 months after surgery, and then again 3, 6 and 12 months after EAS fitting. RESULTS: Hearing could be preserved in all subjects. Speech understanding showed significant improvement in all tests over time with the EAS condition outperforming the cochlear implant-only condition at all intervals. These considerable effects were also reflected in the subjective benefit outcome.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that electric acoustic stimulation (EAS(®)) using the FLEX(EAS) electrode is a successful treatment method for preservation and stability of low frequency hearing, and results in significant improvements in speech perception. OBJECTIVES: Low frequency hearing preservation and stability following EAS surgery with the MED-EL PULSARCI(100) implant using the FLEX(EAS) electrode and a combined processor in a multicentre setting, and the efficacy and benefits of EAS over time were evaluated. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with normal to moderate hearing loss in the low frequencies and severe to profound hearing loss in the high frequencies were implanted with the FLEX(EAS) electrode. Implantation was performed by different surgeons at three participating centres using either the cochleostomy or the round window approach. Preoperatively, hearing was measured; a battery of speech perception tests and the subjective benefit questionnaire were administered. These tests were subsequently repeated: first at EAS fitting, which was due 3 months after surgery, and then again 3, 6 and 12 months after EAS fitting. RESULTS: Hearing could be preserved in all subjects. Speech understanding showed significant improvement in all tests over time with the EAS condition outperforming the cochlear implant-only condition at all intervals. These considerable effects were also reflected in the subjective benefit outcome.
Authors: Christine DeMason; Baishakhi Choudhury; Faisal Ahmad; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Jacob Wang; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Carolyn J Brown; Eun Kyung Jeon; Paul J Abbas; Bruce J Gantz Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta Journal: Anat Rec (Hoboken) Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 2.064