Literature DB >> 9380368

An electrophysiological technique for assessment of the development of spatial vision.

V Zemon1, E E Hartmann, J Gordon, A Prünte-Glowazki.   

Abstract

An objective visual evoked potential (VEP) technique was developed to evaluate spatial processing in humans over a wide range of ages. The constellation of stimulus conditions and analysis methods constitute a novel tool for the assessment of neural development. The key points that delineate this VEP technique are: (1) A brief, 6-s, swept-parameter stimulus with spatial frequency of square-wave grating patterns varied in octave steps, which facilitates correct accommodation and increases the likelihood of collecting uninterrupted, useable data; (2) data collection synchronous with stimulus presentation, which prevents contamination of the relevant frequency component from other frequency components in the response, thereby increasing the signal-to-noise ratio; (3) noise estimation at the response frequency of interest (second harmonic), based on a multivariate statistic (Tcirc2), which yields a realistic measure of signal-to-noise; (4) estimation of grating acuity from linear interpolation of the signal-to-noise measure; (5) monocular testing followed by multivariate statistical comparison of fellow eye data for each spatial frequency condition, which enables the determination of asymmetries within monocular neural pathways; (6) evaluation of maturation of the visual system based on vector-averaged amplitude and phase measures. Preliminary results indicate that reliable response functions are obtained from infants, children, and adults. Acuity estimates increased as a function of age. Phase values decreased consistently with increases in spatial frequency greater than 4 c/deg. Infants produced larger peak amplitude responses than did older observers, consistent with known developmental changes in cortical synaptic density. Phase data for the 2 c/deg condition provided additional evidence for the lack of maturity in the infant visual system as compared with that of older observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9380368     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199709000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  15 in total

1.  Waveform variance and latency jitter of the visual evoked potential in childhood.

Authors:  John P Kelly; Felix Darvas; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation.

Authors:  David S Nicol; Ruth Hamilton; Uma Shahani; Daphne L McCulloch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Effect of optimal dietary therapy upon visual function in children with long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase and trifunctional protein deficiency.

Authors:  Melanie B Gillingham; Richard G Weleber; Martha Neuringer; William E Connor; Monte Mills; Sandy van Calcar; James Ver Hoeve; Jon Wolff; Cary O Harding
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 4.797

4.  Early-stage visual processing and cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Vance Zemon; Isaac Schechter; Alice M Saperstein; Matthew J Hoptman; Kelvin O Lim; Nadine Revheim; Gail Silipo; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-05

5.  Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life.

Authors:  Claudia Polevoy; Gina Muckle; Jean R Séguin; Emmanuel Ouellet; Dave Saint-Amour
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  ERGs, cone-isolating VEPs and analytical techniques in children with cone dysfunction syndromes.

Authors:  John P Kelly; Michael A Crognale; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Sensory contributions to impaired emotion processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Ilana Y Abeles; Nicole G Weiskopf; Arielle Tambini; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Michael E Legatt; Vance Zemon; James Loughead; Ruben C Gur; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Development of contrast mechanisms in humans: a VEP study.

Authors:  Leticia A García-Quispe; James Gordon; Vance Zemon
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 10.  Perception measurement in clinical trials of schizophrenia: promising paradigms from CNTRICS.

Authors:  Michael F Green; Pamela D Butler; Yue Chen; Mark A Geyer; Steven Silverstein; Jonathan K Wynn; Jong H Yoon; Vance Zemon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.