Literature DB >> 2265577

Variability of the steady-state visually evoked potential: interindividual variance and intraindividual reproducibility of spatial frequency tuning.

W Joost1, M Bach.   

Abstract

At low contrast levels there is good agreement between the psychophysical contrast sensitivity function and the tuning curve of the visually evoked potential (i.e., VEP amplitude vs spatial frequency). At high contrast, however, some researchers have found bimodal VEP tuning curves whereas others have not. We studied the VEP in 22 subjects in a short-term cross-sectional study and in 13 subjects in a longitudinal study over 8 sessions covering 28 days. Grating stimuli with 60% contrast were square-wave modulated in time (7.8 reversals/s) and space (0.06-16 cycles/degree). We found large interindividual variance in the shape of the tuning curves; about half of the subjects showed a unimodal shape, while the other half showed a bimodal one (with a 'notch' between 1 and 2 cycles/degree). These features turned out to be stable in the longitudinal study, where variability could mainly be ascribed to a multiplicative influence common to all spatial frequencies. The marked interindividual differences in the shape of the tuning curve, which seem to be intraindividually stable, may explain previous discrepancies. It is not yet clear why the notch exists in about half of our subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2265577     DOI: 10.1007/bf00142594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  12 in total

1.  Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  H Strasburger; W Scheidler; I Rentschler
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Steady-state pattern VEP uncorrelated with suprathreshold contrast perception.

Authors:  H Strasburger; I Rentschler; W Scheidler
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1986

Review 3.  Evoked potentials in vision research 1961-86.

Authors:  D Regan; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The spatial selectivity of early and late waves within the human visual evoked response.

Authors:  D M Parker; E A Salzen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Spatial frequency mechanisms in human vision investigated by evoked potential recording.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Properties of localized pattern evoked potentials.

Authors:  C W Tyler; P A Apkarian
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery.

Authors:  M W Cannon
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Suprathreshold spatiotemporal response characteristics of the human visual system.

Authors:  D O Bowker
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1983-04

9.  Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life.

Authors:  A M Norcia; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Steady state visual evoked potentials in the alert primate.

Authors:  K Nakayama; M Mackeben
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  6 in total

1.  Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation.

Authors:  David S Nicol; Ruth Hamilton; Uma Shahani; Daphne L McCulloch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Relating the steady-state visual evoked potential to single-stimulus responses derived from m-sequence stimulation.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Maresa Groten; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Acuity VEP: improved with machine learning.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Can VEP-based acuity estimates in one eye be improved by applying knowledge from the other eye?

Authors:  Jessica Knötzele; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.

Authors:  Celso Tello; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Tiago S Prata; Peter Derr; Jayson Patel; John Siegfried; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 6.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.