Literature DB >> 21279393

Freehand determination of the trajectory angle for cervical lateral mass screws: how accurate is it?

Debasish Pal1, Edward Bayley, Sani A Magaji, Bronek M Boszczyk.   

Abstract

Different methods of lateral mass screw placement in the cervical spine have been described with separate trajectories for each technique in the sagittal and parasagittal planes. In the latter, plane 30° has been recommended in the modified Magerl's technique as the optimum angle to avoid injury to the vertebral artery and nerve root. The estimation of this angle remains arbitrary and very much operator dependant. The aim of this study was to assess how accurately the lateral trajectory angle of 30° is achieved by visual estimation amongst experienced surgeons in a tertiary spinal unit and to determine the likelihood of neurovascular injury during the procedure. We chose an anatomical 'sawbone' model of the cervical spine with simulated lordosis. The senior author marked the entry points. Five spinal consultants and five senior spinal fellows were asked to insert 1.6-mm K wires into the lateral masses of C3 to C6 bilaterally at 30° to the midsagittal plane using the marked entry points. The lateral angulation in the transverse plane was measured using a custom protractor and documented for each surgeon at each level and side. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the data were obtained to determine the inter observer variability. Utilising this data, measurements were then made on a normal axial computerised tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine of an anonymous patient to determine if there would have been any neurovascular compromise. Among the 10 surgeons, a total of 80 insertion angles were measured from C3 to C6 on either side. The overall mean angle of insertion was 25.15 (range 20.4-34.8). The overall SD was 4.78. Amongst the 80 measurements between the ten surgeons, two episodes of theoretical vertebral artery violation were observed when the angles were simulated on the CT scan. A moderate but notable variability in trajectory placement exists between surgeons during insertion of cervical lateral mass screws. Freehand estimation of 30° is not consistently achieved between surgeons and levels. In patients with gross degenerative or deformed cervical spine anatomy, this may increase the risk of neurovascular injury. The use of the ipsilateral lamina as an anatomical reference plane is supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279393      PMCID: PMC3099156          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1694-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

1.  Characteristics of unicortical and bicortical lateral mass screws in the cervical spine.

Authors:  E A Seybold; J A Baker; A A Criscitiello; N R Ordway; C K Park; P J Connolly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Anatomic consideration for standard and modified techniques of cervical lateral mass screw placement.

Authors:  Andrew A Merola; B Andrew Castro; Paul R Alongi; Sameer Mathur; Mario Brkaric; Franco Vigna; Joseph P Riina; John Gorup; Thomas R Haher
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  Biomechanics of cervical spine internal fixation.

Authors:  P X Montesano; E C Juach; P A Anderson; D R Benson; P B Hanson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates.

Authors:  B Jeanneret; F Magerl; E H Ward; J C Ward
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine.

Authors:  H S An; R Gordin; K Renner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Modified Magerl technique of lateral mass screw placement in the lower cervical spine: an anatomic study.

Authors:  R Xu; N A Ebraheim; T Klausner; R A Yeasting
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1998-06

7.  Safe lateral-mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques. An anatomic study.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; T Klausner; R Xu; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Posterior cervical arthrodesis with AO reconstruction plates and bone graft.

Authors:  P A Anderson; M B Henley; M S Grady; P X Montesano; H R Winn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lamina-guided lateral mass screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine.

Authors:  Edward Bayley; Zergham Zia; Robert Kerslake; Zdenek Klezl; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Complications of posterior cervical plating.

Authors:  J G Heller; D H Silcox; C E Sutterlin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-navigated anterior transpedicular screw insertion in the cervical spine: an experimental study.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Carolin Meyer; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Florian Siedek; Lars Peter Müller; Peer Eysel; Gregor Stein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  An analysis of the anatomic features of the cervical spine using computed tomography to select safer screw insertion techniques.

Authors:  Masahiro Nishinome; Haku Iizuka; Yoichi Iizuka; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Laminoplasty and simultaneous C2 semi-laminectomy with internal fixation in treating ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in cervical discs at C2 segment.

Authors:  Yipeng Yang; Yu Wang; Junming Cao; Tao Lei; Zongyou Yang; Hehuan Xia
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Morphometric subaxial lateral mass evaluation allows for preoperative optimal screw trajectory planning.

Authors:  K Hockel; G Maier; J Rathgeb; M Merkle; F Roser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Lateral mass screw fixation in cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Lal Rehman; Iram Bukhari; Ali Afzal; Raza Rizvi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Incidence and risk factors of poor clinical outcomes in patients with cervical kyphosis after cervical surgery for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jia Li; Yong Shen; Yanwei Zhang; Yongqian Li
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Computed Tomography- and Radiography-Based Morphometric Analysis of the Lateral Mass of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in the Indian Population.

Authors:  Nirmal D Patil; Sudhir K Srivastava; Sunil Bhosale; Shaligram Purohit
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

8.  Limited laminectomy and foraminal decompression combined with internal fixation for treating multi-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Does it effectively improve neurological function and prevent C5 palsy?

Authors:  Yue-Jiang Zhao; Cai Cheng; Han-Wen Chen; Min Li; Lu Wang; Zhi-Yuan Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy.

Authors:  Wei Du; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen; Yingze Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Longxi Ren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.