CONTEXT: Terminal hospitalizations are costly and often avoidable with appropriate advance care planning. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between advance care planning, as measured by facility rate of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in U.S. nursing homes (NHs) and changes in terminal hospitalization rates. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of the changing prevalence of DNR orders in U.S. NHs. Using a fixed effect multivariate model, we examined whether increasing facility rate of DNR orders correlates with reductions in terminal hospitalizations in the last week of life, controlling for changes in facility characteristics (staffing, use of NP/PA, case mix of nursing residents, admission volume, racial composition, payer mix). RESULTS: The average facility rate of terminal hospitalizations was 15.5%, fluctuating between 1999 (15.0%) and 2007 (14.8%). NHs starting with low rates of DNR orders that increased their rates had fewer terminal hospital admissions in 2007 (11.2%) than facilities with continuously low DNR usage. Even after applying a multivariate fixed effect model, the effect of changes in facility DNR order rate on terminal hospitalization was -0.056 (95% confidence interval: -0.061, -0.050), indicating that for every 10% increase in DNR orders there was 0.56% decrease in terminal hospitalizations. This rate can be compared with the increase of 0.70% in the terminal hospitalization rate when an NH became disproportionately dependent on Medicaid funding or the 0.40% decrease in terminal hospitalization rate associated with adding a nurse practitioner to the clinical staff complement. CONCLUSION: NHs that changed their culture of decision making by increasing their facility rate of DNR orders decreased their rate of terminal hospitalizations.
CONTEXT: Terminal hospitalizations are costly and often avoidable with appropriate advance care planning. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between advance care planning, as measured by facility rate of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in U.S. nursing homes (NHs) and changes in terminal hospitalization rates. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of the changing prevalence of DNR orders in U.S. NHs. Using a fixed effect multivariate model, we examined whether increasing facility rate of DNR orders correlates with reductions in terminal hospitalizations in the last week of life, controlling for changes in facility characteristics (staffing, use of NP/PA, case mix of nursing residents, admission volume, racial composition, payer mix). RESULTS: The average facility rate of terminal hospitalizations was 15.5%, fluctuating between 1999 (15.0%) and 2007 (14.8%). NHs starting with low rates of DNR orders that increased their rates had fewer terminal hospital admissions in 2007 (11.2%) than facilities with continuously low DNR usage. Even after applying a multivariate fixed effect model, the effect of changes in facility DNR order rate on terminal hospitalization was -0.056 (95% confidence interval: -0.061, -0.050), indicating that for every 10% increase in DNR orders there was 0.56% decrease in terminal hospitalizations. This rate can be compared with the increase of 0.70% in the terminal hospitalization rate when an NH became disproportionately dependent on Medicaid funding or the 0.40% decrease in terminal hospitalization rate associated with adding a nurse practitioner to the clinical staff complement. CONCLUSION: NHs that changed their culture of decision making by increasing their facility rate of DNR orders decreased their rate of terminal hospitalizations.
Authors: Joan M Teno; Susan L Mitchell; Pedro L Gozalo; David Dosa; Amy Hsu; Orna Intrator; Vincent Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joan L Buchanan; Rachel L Murkofsky; Alistair James O'Malley; Sarita L Karon; David Zimmerman; Daryl J Caudry; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mary Ersek; Justine S Sefcik; Feng-Chang Lin; Tae Joon Lee; Robin Gilliam; Laura C Hanson Journal: Clin Nurs Res Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 2.075
Authors: Daniel S Stadler; Brant J Oliver; Jennifer G Raymond; George F Routzhan; Ellen A Flaherty; James E Stahl; John A Batsis; Stephen J Bartels Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Ellen M McCreedy; Xiaofei Yang; Susan L Mitchell; Roee Gutman; Joan Teno; Lacey Loomer; Patience Moyo; Angelo Volandes; Pedro L Gozalo; Emmanuelle Belanger; Jessica Ogarek; Vincent Mor Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: William Silvester; Rachael S Fullam; Ruth A Parslow; Virginia J Lewis; Rebekah Sjanta; Lynne Jackson; Vanessa White; Jane Gilchrist Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 3.568