Literature DB >> 28068789

PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes: The design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in the nursing home setting.

Vincent Mor1,2, Angelo E Volandes3,4, Roee Gutman5, Constantine Gatsonis5,6, Susan L Mitchell4,7,8.   

Abstract

Background/Aims Nursing homes are complex healthcare systems serving an increasingly sick population. Nursing homes must engage patients in advance care planning, but do so inconsistently. Video decision support tools improved advance care planning in small randomized controlled trials. Pragmatic trials are increasingly employed in health services research, although not commonly in the nursing home setting to which they are well-suited. This report presents the design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial that evaluated the "real world" application of an Advance Care Planning Video Program in two large US nursing home healthcare systems. Methods PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes was conducted in 360 nursing homes (N = 119 intervention/N = 241 control) owned by two healthcare systems. Over an 18-month implementation period, intervention facilities were instructed to offer the Advance Care Planning Video Program to all patients. Control facilities employed usual advance care planning practices. Patient characteristics and outcomes were ascertained from Medicare Claims, Minimum Data Set assessments, and facility electronic medical record data. Intervention adherence was measured using a Video Status Report embedded into electronic medical record systems. The primary outcome was the number of hospitalizations/person-day alive among long-stay patients with advanced dementia or cardiopulmonary disease. The rationale for the approaches to facility randomization and recruitment, intervention implementation, population selection, data acquisition, regulatory issues, and statistical analyses are discussed. Results The large number of well-characterized candidate facilities enabled several unique design features including stratification on historical hospitalization rates, randomization prior to recruitment, and 2:1 control to intervention facilities ratio. Strong endorsement from corporate leadership made randomization prior to recruitment feasible with 100% participation of facilities randomized to the intervention arm. Critical regulatory issues included minimal risk determination, waiver of informed consent, and determination that nursing home providers were not engaged in human subjects research. Intervention training and implementation were initiated on 5 January 2016 using corporate infrastructures for new program roll-out guided by standardized training elements designed by the research team. Video Status Reports in facilities' electronic medical records permitted "real-time" adherence monitoring and corrective actions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Virtual Research Data Center allowed for rapid outcomes ascertainment. Conclusion We must rigorously evaluate interventions to deliver more patient-focused care to an increasingly frail nursing home population. Video decision support is a practical approach to improve advance care planning. PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes has the potential to promote goal-directed care among millions of older Americans in nursing homes and establish a methodology for future pragmatic randomized controlled trials in this complex healthcare setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster randomized clinical trial; advance care planning; decision aids; end of life; nursing home; pragmatic trial

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28068789      PMCID: PMC5376219          DOI: 10.1177/1740774516685298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  60 in total

1.  The costs and potential savings associated with nursing home hospitalizations.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; A James O'Malley; Nancy R Barhydt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  A randomized controlled trial of a goals-of-care video for elderly patients admitted to skilled nursing facilities.

Authors:  Angelo E Volandes; Gary H Brandeis; Aretha Delight Davis; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Muriel R Gillick; Yuchiao Chang; Elizabeth S Walker-Corkery; Eileen Mann; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Changes in hospitalization associated with introducing the Resident Assessment Instrument.

Authors:  V Mor; O Intrator; B E Fries; C Phillips; J Teno; J Hiris; C Hawes; J Morris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  The OBRA-87 nursing home regulations and implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument: effects on process quality.

Authors:  C Hawes; V Mor; C D Phillips; B E Fries; J N Morris; E Steele-Friedlob; A M Greene; M Nennstiel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Hospital transfers of nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

Authors:  Jane L Givens; Kevin Selby; Keith S Goldfeld; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Assessing end-of-life preferences for advanced dementia in rural patients using an educational video: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Angelo E Volandes; Laurie Anne Ferguson; Aretha D Davis; Nathan C Hull; Michael J Green; Yuchiao Chang; Kristy Deep; Michael K Paasche-Orlow
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Treatment of the dying in the acute care hospital. Advanced dementia and metastatic cancer.

Authors:  J C Ahronheim; R S Morrison; S A Baskin; J Morris; D E Meier
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-10-14

8.  Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life?

Authors:  Susan C Miller; Vincent Mor; Ning Wu; Pedro Gozalo; Kate Lapane
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  The clinical course of advanced dementia.

Authors:  Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pragmatic Trials.

Authors:  Ian Ford; John Norrie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  20 in total

1.  Overcoming Challenges to Evidence-Based Policy Development in a Large, Integrated Delivery System.

Authors:  Austin B Frakt; Julia C Prentice; Steven D Pizer; A Rani Elwy; Melissa M Garrido; Amy M Kilbourne; David Atkins
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Junghwan Lee; Ziheng Zhou; Ying Kuen Cheung; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Representation in the Care Planning Process for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.

Authors:  Ellen McCreedy; Lacey Loomer; Jennifer A Palmer; Susan L Mitchell; Angelo Volandes; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.669

4.  Nursing Home Characteristics Associated With Implementation of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention.

Authors:  Lacey Loomer; Ellen McCreedy; Emmanuelle Belanger; Jennifer A Palmer; Susan L Mitchell; Angelo E Volandes; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  Embedded Pragmatic Trials in Dementia Care: Realizing the Vision of the NIA IMPACT Collaboratory.

Authors:  Susan L Mitchell; Vincent Mor; Jill Harrison; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Statistical Considerations for Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials in People Living with Dementia.

Authors:  Heather G Allore; Keith S Goldfeld; Roee Gutman; Fan Li; Joan K Monin; Monica Taljaard; Thomas G Travison
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Using Healthcare Data in Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials among People Living with Dementia and Their Caregivers: State of the Art.

Authors:  Julie P W Bynum; David A Dorr; Julie Lima; Ellen P McCarthy; Ellen McCreedy; Richard Platt; V G Vinod Vydiswaran
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Achieving Health Equity in Embedded Pragmatic Trials for People Living with Dementia and Their Family Caregivers.

Authors:  Ana R Quiñones; Susan L Mitchell; Jonathan D Jackson; María P Aranda; Peggye Dilworth-Anderson; Ellen P McCarthy; Ladson Hinton
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Selecting Outcomes to Ensure Pragmatic Trials Are Relevant to People Living with Dementia.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Antonia V Bennett; Mattias Jonsson; Amy Kelley; Christine Ritchie; Debra Saliba; Joan Teno; Sheryl Zimmerman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Impact of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention on Care of Short-Stay Nursing Home Patients.

Authors:  Lacey Loomer; Jessica A Ogarek; Susan L Mitchell; Angelo E Volandes; Roee Gutman; Pedro L Gozalo; Ellen M McCreedy; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.