BACKGROUND: There is consistent evidence of significant variation in the quality of end-of-life care among nursing homes, with many facilities ill-prepared to provide optimal physical and psychological care that is culturally sensitive and respectful of the needs and preferences of residents and their family members. There is continued evidence that what is impeding efforts to improve care is that most measurement tools are hampered by a lack of distinction between quality of care and quality of dying as well as a lack of complete psychometric evaluation. Further, health services researchers cite the need to include "system-level" factors, variables that reflect leadership, culture, or informal practices, all of which influence end-of-life care and can be used to differentiate one setting from another. The purpose of this article is to report advancement in conceptualizing quality end-of-life care in nursing homes and to offer a refined approach to measurement. METHODS: Two latent constructs are tested: quality of care (composed of system-level factors) and quality of dying (comprised of resident/family outcomes). Data obtained from 85 Midwestern nursing homes and 1282 interviews with bereaved family members were used to evaluate both constructs. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted and evidence of validity and reliability were obtained for both. CONCLUSION: For health services researchers, expanded models that include system-level factors as well as more comprehensive and psychometrically sound models of resident outcomes stand to inform efforts to improve care in this very important area.
BACKGROUND: There is consistent evidence of significant variation in the quality of end-of-life care among nursing homes, with many facilities ill-prepared to provide optimal physical and psychological care that is culturally sensitive and respectful of the needs and preferences of residents and their family members. There is continued evidence that what is impeding efforts to improve care is that most measurement tools are hampered by a lack of distinction between quality of care and quality of dying as well as a lack of complete psychometric evaluation. Further, health services researchers cite the need to include "system-level" factors, variables that reflect leadership, culture, or informal practices, all of which influence end-of-life care and can be used to differentiate one setting from another. The purpose of this article is to report advancement in conceptualizing quality end-of-life care in nursing homes and to offer a refined approach to measurement. METHODS: Two latent constructs are tested: quality of care (composed of system-level factors) and quality of dying (comprised of resident/family outcomes). Data obtained from 85 Midwestern nursing homes and 1282 interviews with bereaved family members were used to evaluate both constructs. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted and evidence of validity and reliability were obtained for both. CONCLUSION: For health services researchers, expanded models that include system-level factors as well as more comprehensive and psychometrically sound models of resident outcomes stand to inform efforts to improve care in this very important area.
Authors: Joseph G Ouslander; Gerri Lamb; Mary Perloe; JoVonn H Givens; Linda Kluge; Tracy Rutland; Adam Atherly; Debra Saliba Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Richard A Mularski; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne M Wilkinson; Joanne Lynn; Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Virginia C Sun; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Karl A Lorenz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Lara Pivodic; Tinne Smets; Nele Van den Noortgate; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Yvonne Engels; Katarzyna Szczerbińska; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Katherine Froggatt; Giovanni Gambassi; Luc Deliens; Lieve Van den Block Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.762