Literature DB >> 2751179

Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly.

D J Murphy1, A M Murray, B E Robinson, E W Campion.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly and to define characteristics of elderly patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation is effective.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Five Boston health-care institutions: two acute-care hospitals; two chronic-care hospitals; and one long-term-care institution. PATIENTS: Five hundred and three consecutive patients aged 70 and over who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 503 patients, 112 (22%) survived initially but only 19 (3.8%) survived to hospital discharge. The poorest outcomes were for patients with unwitnessed arrests (1 of 116 survived), terminal arrhythmias such as asystole and electromechanical dissociation (1 of 237 survived), and patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation lasting more than 15 minutes (1 of 360 survived). Only 2 (0.8%; CI, 0.0% to 2.0%) of 244 patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests left the hospital alive. Of 259 patients with in-hospital arrests, 17 (6.5%; CI, 3.4% to 9.6%) survived to discharge. Most survivors had ventricular arrhythmias and were resuscitated within minutes. Initial survivors with either impaired consciousness or functional impairment after the arrest had significantly worse chances of survival than patients without these impairments.
CONCLUSION: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is rarely effective for elderly patients with cardiopulmonary arrests that are either out-of-hospital, unwitnessed, or associated with asystole or electromechanical dissociation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2751179     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-3-199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  40 in total

1.  Do not resuscitate orders: considerations for family physicians.

Authors:  Philip C Hébert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Terminal hospitalizations of nursing home residents: does facility increasing the rate of do not resuscitate orders reduce them?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro Gozalo; Susan L Mitchell; Julie P W Bynum; David Dosa; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Resuscitation of the elderly and the terminally ill.

Authors:  W I Morse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The inability of physicians to predict the outcome of in-hospital resuscitation.

Authors:  M H Ebell; G R Bergus; L Warbasse; R Bloomer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Judgments of futility: what should ethics committees be thinking about?

Authors:  J W Ross
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1991

6.  CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients: a single center's experience.

Authors:  Do-Youn Oh; Jee-Hyun Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang; Noe Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Medical futility: a paradigm analysis.

Authors:  Nancy S Jecker
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-03

Review 8.  Ethical considerations in pharmacotherapy of the aged.

Authors:  M K Goldstein
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  DNR policy and CPR practice in geriatric long-term institutional care.

Authors:  M Gordon; M Cheung
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data.

Authors:  R S Schonwetter; R M Walker; D R Kramer; B E Robinson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.