Literature DB >> 21272195

The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure.

George L Bakris1, Domenic Sica, Michael Weber, William B White, Andrew Roberts, Alfonso Perez, Charlie Cao, Stuart Kupfer.   

Abstract

The current study assesses the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the investigational angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M), compared with placebo and the ARB olmesartan medoxomil (OLM-M). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study assessed change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) following 6 weeks of treatment. Patients with primary hypertension (n=1275) and baseline 24-hour mean ambulatory systolic pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg and ≤ 170 mm Hg were studied; 142 received placebo and the remainder received 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg AZL-M or 40 mg OLM-M. Mean age of participants was 58 ± 11 years, baseline mean 24-hour SBP was 146 mm Hg. Dose-dependent reductions in 24-hour mean SBP at study end occurred in all AZL-M groups. Reduction in 24-hour mean SBP was greater with AZL-M 80 mg than OLM-M 40 mg by 2.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -4.0 to -0.1; P=.038), while AZL-M 40 mg was noninferior to OLM-M 40 mg. The side effect profiles of both ARBs were similar to placebo. AZL-M is well tolerated and more efficacious at its maximal dose than the highest dose of OLM-M.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21272195      PMCID: PMC8673073          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  19 in total

1.  Performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Emilio D Poggio; Xuelei Wang; Tom Greene; Frederik Van Lente; Phillip M Hall
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Persistence, adherence, and risk of discontinuation associated with commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug monotherapies.

Authors:  William J Elliott; Craig A Plauschinat; Grant H Skrepnek; Douglas Gause
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 3.  Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  F Turnbull; B Neal; T Ninomiya; C Algert; H Arima; F Barzi; C Bulpitt; J Chalmers; R Fagard; A Gleason; S Heritier; N Li; V Perkovic; M Woodward; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-14

4.  In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies.

Authors:  Mami Ojima; Hideki Igata; Masayuki Tanaka; Hiroki Sakamoto; Takanobu Kuroita; Yasuhisa Kohara; Keiji Kubo; Hiromitsu Fuse; Yoshimi Imura; Keiji Kusumoto; Hideaki Nagaya
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Blood pressure response, but not adverse event incidence, correlates with dose of angiotensin II antagonist.

Authors:  K Püchler; P Laeis; K O Stumpe
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  2001-06

6.  Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

Authors:  B M Brenner; M E Cooper; D de Zeeuw; W F Keane; W E Mitch; H H Parving; G Remuzzi; S M Snapinn; Z Zhang; S Shahinfar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring predicts cardiovascular events in treated hypertensive patients--an Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial substudy.

Authors:  Eamon Dolan; Alice V Stanton; Simon Thom; Mark Caulfield; Neil Atkins; Gordon McInnes; David Collier; Patrick Dicker; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  The effect of valsartan, captopril, or both on atherosclerotic events after acute myocardial infarction: an analysis of the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT).

Authors:  John McMurray; Scott Solomon; Karen Pieper; Shelby Reed; Jean Rouleau; Eric Velazquez; Harvey White; Jonathan Howlett; Karl Swedberg; Aldo Maggioni; Lars Køber; Frans Van de Werf; Rob Califf; Marc Pfeffer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of olmesartan relative to other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: an overview of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Faiez Zannad; Renaud Fay
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.748

10.  Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension.

Authors:  S Oparil; D Williams; S G Chrysant; T C Marbury; J Neutel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Should two-drug initial therapy for hypertension be recommended for all patients?

Authors:  Jennifer B Cowart; Addison A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Key advances in antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  Ludovit Paulis; Ulrike M Steckelings; Thomas Unger
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Azilsartan medoxomil: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Prevention of coronary artery disease: recent advances in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Chiara Recarti; Thomas Unger
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Azilsartan Medoxomil (Edarbi): The Eighth Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker.

Authors:  Jocelyn D Jones; Sylvia H Jackson; Carmen Agboton; Tonya S Martin
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-10

6.  Changeover Trial of Azilsartan and Olmesartan Comparing Effects on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Patients with Essential Hypertension after Cardiac Surgery (CHAOS Study).

Authors:  Akira Sezai; Shunji Osaka; Hiroko Yaoita; Munehito Arimoto; Hiroaki Hata; Motomi Shiono; Hisakuni Sakino
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.520

7.  Unique binding behavior of the recently approved angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan compared with that of candesartan.

Authors:  Shin-ichiro Miura; Atsutoshi Okabe; Yoshino Matsuo; Sadashiva S Karnik; Keijiro Saku
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  The past, present and future of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition.

Authors:  Robert J Mentz; George L Bakris; Bernard Waeber; John J V McMurray; Mihai Gheorghiade; Luis M Ruilope; Aldo P Maggioni; Karl Swedberg; Ileana L Piña; Mona Fiuzat; Christopher M O'Connor; Faiez Zannad; Bertram Pitt
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Single-center evaluation of the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist azilsartan medoxomil in renal impairment.

Authors:  Richard A Preston; Aziz Karim; Caroline Dudkowski; Zhen Zhao; Dyal Garg; Oliver Lenz; Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.