BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a potent angiotensin II receptor blocker that decreases blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. It is a pro-drug and not detected in blood after oral administration because of rapid hydrolysis to the active moiety, azilsartan (AZL). AZL undergoes further metabolism to the major metabolite M-II and minor metabolites. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of AZL and its major metabolite. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, phase I parallel-group study which examined the single-dose (40-mg) pharmacokinetics of AZL and M-II in 24 subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (n = 6 per group), respectively, and healthy matched subjects (n = 24). RESULTS: Renal impairment/disease did not cause clinically meaningful increases in exposure to AZL. M-II exposure was higher in all renally impaired subjects and highest in those with severe impairment (approx fivefold higher vs. control). M-II is pharmacologically inactive; increased exposure was not considered important in dose selection for AZL-M in subjects with renal impairment. Hemodialysis did not significantly remove AZL or M-II. Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on the plasma protein binding of AZL or M-II. Single doses of AZL-M 40 mg were well tolerated in all subject groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the pharmacokinetic and tolerability findings, no dose adjustment of AZL-M is required for subjects with any degree of renal impairment, including end-stage renal disease.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a potent angiotensin II receptor blocker that decreases blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. It is a pro-drug and not detected in blood after oral administration because of rapid hydrolysis to the active moiety, azilsartan (AZL). AZL undergoes further metabolism to the major metabolite M-II and minor metabolites. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of AZL and its major metabolite. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, phase I parallel-group study which examined the single-dose (40-mg) pharmacokinetics of AZL and M-II in 24 subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (n = 6 per group), respectively, and healthy matched subjects (n = 24). RESULTS:Renal impairment/disease did not cause clinically meaningful increases in exposure to AZL. M-II exposure was higher in all renally impaired subjects and highest in those with severe impairment (approx fivefold higher vs. control). M-II is pharmacologically inactive; increased exposure was not considered important in dose selection for AZL-M in subjects with renal impairment. Hemodialysis did not significantly remove AZL or M-II. Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on the plasma protein binding of AZL or M-II. Single doses of AZL-M 40 mg were well tolerated in all subject groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the pharmacokinetic and tolerability findings, no dose adjustment of AZL-M is required for subjects with any degree of renal impairment, including end-stage renal disease.
Authors: Catherine Demers; John J V McMurray; Karl Swedberg; Marc A Pfeffer; Christopher B Granger; Bertil Olofsson; Robert S McKelvie; Jan Ostergren; Eric L Michelson; Peter A Johansson; Duolao Wang; Salim Yusuf Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Hans Ibsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lars H Lindholm; Hans Ibsen; Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel; Peter Aurup; Jonathan Edelman; Steven Snapinn Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lars H Lindholm; Björn Dahlöf; Jonathan M Edelman; Hans Ibsen; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Michael Hecht Olsen; Steven Snapinn; Kristian Wachtell Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-08-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Scott D Solomon; Duolao Wang; Peter Finn; Hicham Skali; Leonardo Zornoff; John J V McMurray; Karl Swedberg; Salim Yusuf; Christopher B Granger; Eric L Michelson; Stuart Pocock; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-10-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Hans-Christoph Diener; Ralph L Sacco; Daniel Cotton; Stephanie Ounpuu; William A Lawton; Yuko Palesch; Reneé H Martin; Gregory W Albers; Philip Bath; Natan Bornstein; Bernard P L Chan; Sien-Tsong Chen; Luis Cunha; Björn Dahlöf; Jacques De Keyser; Geoffrey A Donnan; Conrado Estol; Philip Gorelick; Vivian Gu; Karin Hermansson; Lutz Hilbrich; Markku Kaste; Chuanzhen Lu; Thomas Machnig; Prem Pais; Robin Roberts; Veronika Skvortsova; Philip Teal; Danilo Toni; Cam VanderMaelen; Thor Voigt; Michael Weber; Byung-Woo Yoon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Yusuf; K Teo; C Anderson; J Pogue; L Dyal; I Copland; H Schumacher; G Dagenais; P Sleight Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nicholas J A Webb; Thomas Wells; Max Tsai; Zhen Zhao; Attila Juhasz; Caroline Dudkowski Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Caroline Dudkowski; Aziz Karim; Zhen Zhao; Alberto B Alonso; Dyal Garg; Richard A Preston Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.126