Literature DB >> 23034464

Unique binding behavior of the recently approved angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan compared with that of candesartan.

Shin-ichiro Miura1, Atsutoshi Okabe, Yoshino Matsuo, Sadashiva S Karnik, Keijiro Saku.   

Abstract

The angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan strongly reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension and has been shown to have cardioprotective effects. A new ARB, azilsartan, was recently approved and has been shown to provide a more potent 24-h sustained antihypertensive effect than candesartan. However, the molecular interactions of azilsartan with the AT(1) receptor that could explain its strong BP-lowering activity are not yet clear. To address this issue, we examined the binding affinities of ARBs for the AT(1) receptor and their inverse agonist activity toward the production of inositol phosphate (IP), and we constructed docking models for the interactions between ARBs and the receptor. Azilsartan, unlike candesartan, has a unique moiety, a 5-oxo-1,2,4-oxadiazole, in place of a tetrazole ring. Although the results regarding the binding affinities of azilsartan and candesartan demonstrated that these ARBs interact with the same sites in the AT(1) receptor (Tyr(113), Lys(199) and Gln(257)), the hydrogen bonding between the oxadiazole of azilsartan-Gln(257) is stronger than that between the tetrazole of candesartan-Gln(257), according to molecular docking models. An examination of the inhibition of IP production by ARBs using constitutively active mutant receptors indicated that inverse agonist activity required azilsartan-Gln(257) interaction and that azilsartan had a stronger interaction with Gln(257) than candesartan. Thus, we speculate that azilsartan has a unique binding behavior to the AT(1) receptor due to its 5-oxo-1,2,4-oxadiazole moiety and induces stronger inverse agonism. This property of azilsartan may underlie its previously demonstrated superior BP-lowering efficacy compared with candesartan and other ARBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23034464      PMCID: PMC3951115          DOI: 10.1038/hr.2012.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  29 in total

Review 1.  Structure-activity relationships of inverse agonists for G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Willem Soudijn; Ineke van Wijngaarden; Adriaan P Ijzerman
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.944

2.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects.

Authors:  Woody Sherman; Tyler Day; Matthew P Jacobson; Richard A Friesner; Ramy Farid
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.

Authors:  William B White; Michael A Weber; Domenic Sica; George L Bakris; Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao; Stuart Kupfer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies.

Authors:  Mami Ojima; Hideki Igata; Masayuki Tanaka; Hiroki Sakamoto; Takanobu Kuroita; Yasuhisa Kohara; Keiji Kubo; Hiromitsu Fuse; Yoshimi Imura; Keiji Kusumoto; Hideaki Nagaya
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 5.  Angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension. New insights from Japan.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Fabio Angeli; Giovanni Mazzotta; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  A small difference in the molecular structure of angiotensin II receptor blockers induces AT₁ receptor-dependent and -independent beneficial effects.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujino; Shin-ichiro Miura; Yoshihiro Kiya; Yukio Tominaga; Yoshino Matsuo; Sadashiva S Karnik; Keijiro Saku
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 7.  Next generation multifunctional angiotensin receptor blockers.

Authors:  Theodore W Kurtz; Uwe Klein
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 8.  Antihypertensive activity of angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists: a systematic review of studies with 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Maria Jose Fabia; Noelia Abdilla; Rosa Oltra; Conrado Fernandez; Josep Redon
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Differential bonding interactions of inverse agonists of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in stabilizing the inactive state.

Authors:  Shin-ichiro Miura; Yoshihiro Kiya; Takanori Kanazawa; Satoshi Imaizumi; Masahiro Fujino; Yoshino Matsuo; Sadashiva S Karnik; Keijiro Saku
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-09-27

10.  The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure.

Authors:  George L Bakris; Domenic Sica; Michael Weber; William B White; Andrew Roberts; Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao; Stuart Kupfer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  9 in total

1.  Preclinical research strategies for newly approved drugs as reflected in early publication patterns.

Authors:  Ursula Köster; Ingo Nolte; Martin C Michel
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 2.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCIX. Angiotensin Receptors: Interpreters of Pathophysiological Angiotensinergic Stimuli [corrected].

Authors:  Sadashiva S Karnik; Hamiyet Unal; Jacqueline R Kemp; Kalyan C Tirupula; Satoru Eguchi; Patrick M L Vanderheyden; Walter G Thomas
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Structural Basis for Ligand Recognition and Functional Selectivity at Angiotensin Receptor.

Authors:  Haitao Zhang; Hamiyet Unal; Russell Desnoyer; Gye Won Han; Nilkanth Patel; Vsevolod Katritch; Sadashiva S Karnik; Vadim Cherezov; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structure of the Angiotensin receptor revealed by serial femtosecond crystallography.

Authors:  Haitao Zhang; Hamiyet Unal; Cornelius Gati; Gye Won Han; Wei Liu; Nadia A Zatsepin; Daniel James; Dingjie Wang; Garrett Nelson; Uwe Weierstall; Michael R Sawaya; Qingping Xu; Marc Messerschmidt; Garth J Williams; Sébastien Boutet; Oleksandr M Yefanov; Thomas A White; Chong Wang; Andrii Ishchenko; Kalyan C Tirupula; Russell Desnoyer; Jesse Coe; Chelsie E Conrad; Petra Fromme; Raymond C Stevens; Vsevolod Katritch; Sadashiva S Karnik; Vadim Cherezov
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Evidence to Consider Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers for the Treatment of Early Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Juan M Saavedra
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  Azilsartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, restores endothelial function by reducing vascular inflammation and by increasing the phosphorylation ratio Ser(1177)/Thr(497) of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Sachiko Matsumoto; Michio Shimabukuro; Daiju Fukuda; Takeshi Soeki; Ken Yamakawa; Hiroaki Masuzaki; Masataka Sata
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 7.  Biased G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling: New Player in Modulating Physiology and Pathology.

Authors:  Zuzana Bologna; Jian-Peng Teoh; Ahmed S Bayoumi; Yaoliang Tang; Il-Man Kim
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Reassessment of the unique mode of binding between angiotensin II type 1 receptor and their blockers.

Authors:  Shin-Ichiro Miura; Naoki Nakao; Hiroyuki Hanzawa; Yoshino Matsuo; Keijiro Saku; Sadashiva S Karnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Azilsartan Improves Salt Sensitivity by Modulating the Proximal Tubular Na+-H+ Exchanger-3 in Mice.

Authors:  Masaki Hatanaka; Jun-Ya Kaimori; Satoko Yamamoto; Isao Matsui; Takayuki Hamano; Yoshitsugu Takabatake; Carolyn M Ecelbarger; Shiro Takahara; Yoshitaka Isaka; Hiromi Rakugi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.