Literature DB >> 21271339

Testing and treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture in an integrated U.S. healthcare delivery system.

A Shibli-Rahhal1, M S Vaughan-Sarrazin, K Richardson, P Cram.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Older veterans with acute hip fracture do not receive adequate evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis, irrespective of their age and underlying health status.
INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are a serious complication of osteoporosis, leading to high mortality and morbidity. Prior studies have found significant undertreatment of osteoporosis in women with hip fracture. We examined the rate of bone density (BMD) testing and osteoporosis treatment among a predominantly male population hospitalized with hip fractures.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients age 65 years and older hospitalized in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with hip fracture (N = 3,347) between 1 October, 2004 and 30 September, 2006. The primary outcome was receipt of BMD testing or initiation of pharmacotherapy within 12 months of fracture.
RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 79.0 years (SD = 6.7), 96.5% were male, and 83.3% were white. Only 1.2% of hip fracture patients underwent BMD testing and 14.5% received osteoporosis therapy within 12 months of fracture. Among fracture patients with minimal comorbid illness (N = 756) only 1.6% underwent BMD testing and 13.0% received pharmacotherapy. In logistic regression models, treatment rates were higher for women compared to men (odds ratio, 3.30; 95% CI, 2.16-5.04) and lower for blacks compared to whites (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis among patients with fractures is suboptimal even in an integrated healthcare delivery system with generous pharmaceutical coverage. This study suggests that the undertreatment of osteoporosis demonstrated in the private sector is also present within the VA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21271339     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1536-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  40 in total

1.  The risk of subsequent fractures in community-dwelling men and male veterans with hip fracture.

Authors:  C S Colón-Emeric; R Sloane; W G Hawkes; J Magaziner; S I Zimmerman; C F Pieper; K W Lyles
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  The effect of a fracture protocol on hospital prescriptions after minimal trauma fractured neck of the femur: a retrospective audit.

Authors:  Graeme Jones; Sandi Warr; Emma Francis; Timothy Greenaway
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Evaluation of osteoporosis treatment in seniors after hip fracture.

Authors:  A G Juby; C M De Geus-Wenceslau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Expert physician recommendations and current practice patterns for evaluating and treating men with osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  C Colón-Emeric; L Yballe; R Sloane; C F Pieper; K W Lyles
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Debbie Bellerose; Anthony S Russell; David A Hanley; Don W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Barriers to the implementation of evidence in osteoporosis treatment in hip fracture.

Authors:  M R Levinson; F J Clay
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Michael Herson; Eric Orwoll; Chuhe Chen; Mikel Aickin; Martha C Swain
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients with recent fractures: a nationwide analysis of prescription rates and persistence.

Authors:  C Roerholt; P Eiken; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  The osteoporotic male: overlooked and undermanaged?

Authors:  Bruno Madeo; Lucia Zirilli; Giovanni Caffagni; Chiara Diazzi; Alessia Sanguanini; Elisa Pignatti; Cesare Carani; Vincenzo Rochira
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Fracture mechanisms and fracture pattern in men and women aged 50 years and older: a study of a 12-year population-based injury register, Umeå, Sweden.

Authors:  U Bergström; U Björnstig; H Stenlund; H Jonsson; O Svensson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 5.071

View more
  21 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.

Authors:  J H E Yong; L Masucci; J S Hoch; R Sujic; D Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Male osteoporosis.

Authors:  Matthew T Drake; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy following initiation within a secondary fracture prevention program: a randomised controlled trial of specialist vs. non-specialist management.

Authors:  K Ganda; A Schaffer; S Pearson; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Ganda; M Puech; J S Chen; R Speerin; J Bleasel; J R Center; J A Eisman; L March; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Disparities in osteoporosis treatments.

Authors:  Z Liu; J Weaver; A de Papp; Z Li; J Martin; K Allen; S Hui; E A Imel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Implementing a fracture follow-up liaison service: perspective of key stakeholders.

Authors:  Mireille Luc; Hélène Corriveau; Gilles Boire; Johanne Filiatrault; Marie-Claude Beaulieu; Pierre Dagenais; Isabelle Gaboury
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Fracture Rates and Bone Density Among Postmenopausal Veteran and Non-Veteran Women From the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Joanne LaFleur; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Kristin A Knippenberg; Kristine E Ensrud; Shelly L Gray; Jane A Cauley; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2016-02

Review 8.  Androgens and estrogens in skeletal sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Michaël Laurent; Leen Antonio; Mieke Sinnesael; Vanessa Dubois; Evelien Gielen; Frank Classens; Dirk Vanderschueren
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Post-fracture pharmacotherapy for women with osteoporotic fracture: analysis of a managed care population in the USA.

Authors:  A Wilk; S Sajjan; A Modi; C-P S Fan; P Mavros
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fractures in jeju cohort study.

Authors:  Sang-Rim Kim; Yong-Geun Park; Soo Yong Kang; Kwang Woo Nam; Yong-Gum Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.