Literature DB >> 18691259

Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.

Leigh W Simmons1, Francisco García-González.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is thought to favor the evolution of secondary sexual traits in males that contribute to mating success. In species where females mate with more than one male, sexual selection also continues after copulation in the form of sperm competition and cryptic female choice. Theory suggests that sperm competition should favor traits such as testes size and sperm production that increase a male's competitive fertilization success. Studies of experimental evolution offer a powerful approach for assessing evolutionary responses to variation in sexual selection pressures. Here we removed sexual selection by enforcing monogamy on replicate lines of a naturally polygamous horned beetle, Onthophagus taurus, and monitoring male investment in their testes for 21 generations. Testes size decreased in monogamous lines relative to lines in which sexual selection was allowed to continue. Differences in testes size were dependent on selection history and not breeding regime. Males from polygamous lines also had a competitive fertilization advantage when in sperm competition with males from monogamous lines. Females from polygamous lines produced sons in better condition, and those from monogamous lines increased their sons condition by mating polygamously. Rather than being costly for females, multiple mating appears to provide females with direct and/or indirect benefits. Neither body size nor horn size diverged between our monogamous and polygamous lines. Our data show that sperm competition does drive the evolution of testes size in onthophagine beetles, and provide general support for sperm competition theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18691259     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00479.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  44 in total

Review 1.  It's all in your head: the role of quantity estimation in sperm competition.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mating tactics determine patterns of condition dependence in a dimorphic horned beetle.

Authors:  Robert J Knell; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Lukasz Michalczyk; Oliver Y Martin; Anna L Millard; Brent C Emerson; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Offspring viability benefits but no apparent costs of mating with high quality males.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Rebecca Holley
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Sperm competition risk generates phenotypic plasticity in ovum fertilizability.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Ultrastructure of spermatozoa of Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) exhibits heritable variation.

Authors:  Michael Werner; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-01-29

8.  Polyandrous females benefit by producing sons that achieve high reproductive success in a competitive environment.

Authors:  Renée C Firman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Experimental coevolution of male and female genital morphology.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Yukio Yasui; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.