Literature DB >> 17439614

Shorter sperm confer higher competitive fertilization success.

Francisco García-González1, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

Spermatozoa exhibit taxonomically widespread patterns of divergent morphological evolution. However, the adaptive significance of variation in sperm morphology remains unclear. In this study we examine the role of natural variation in sperm length on fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. We conducted sperm competition trials between males that differed in the length of their sperm and determined the paternity of resulting offspring using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. We also quantified variation in the size and shape of the female's sperm storage organ to determine whether female morphology influenced the competitiveness of different sperm morphologies. We found that fertilization success was biased toward males with relatively shorter sperm, but that selection on sperm length was dependent on female tract morphology; selection was directional for reduced sperm length across most of the spermathecal size range, but stabilizing in females with the smallest spermathecae. Our data provide empirical support for the theory that sperm competition should favor the evolution of numerous tiny sperm. Moreover, because sperm length is both heritable and genetically correlated with condition, our results are consistent with a process by which females can accrue genetic benefits for their offspring from the incitement of sperm competition and/or cryptic female choice, as proposed by the "sexy sperm" and "good sperm" models for the evolution of polyandry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439614     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00084.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  28 in total

1.  Evolution and spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Helen White-Cooper; Nina Bausek
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Patterns of genetic variation and covariation in ejaculate traits reveal potential evolutionary constraints in guppies.

Authors:  J P Evans
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  No evidence for sperm priming responses under varying sperm competition risk or intensity in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-03-24

4.  Sperm competitiveness in frogs: slow and steady wins the race.

Authors:  Martin A Dziminski; J Dale Roberts; Maxine Beveridge; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Quantitative genetic correlation between trait and preference supports a sexually selected sperm process.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Janne S Kotiaho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ultrastructure of spermatozoa of Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) exhibits heritable variation.

Authors:  Michael Werner; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-01-29

7.  Polyandrous females benefit by producing sons that achieve high reproductive success in a competitive environment.

Authors:  Renée C Firman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sperm swimming velocity predicts competitive fertilization success in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Leigh W Simmons; Maxine Beveridge; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intra-specific variation of sperm length in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae: males with shorter sperm have higher reproductive success.

Authors:  Maarten J Voordouw; Jacob C Koella; Hilary Hurd
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Genetic and potential non-genetic benefits increase offspring fitness of polyandrous females in non-resource based mating system.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen; Geir Rudolfsen; Matti Janhunen; Lars Figenschou; Nina Peuhkuri; Niina Tamper; Raine Kortet
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.