Literature DB >> 11983863

The genetics of maternal care: direct and indirect genetic effects on phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.

John Hunt1, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

While theoretical models of the evolution of parental care are based on the assumption of underlying genetic variance, surprisingly few quantitative genetic studies of this life-history trait exist. Estimation of the degree of genetic variance in parental care is important because it can be a significant source of maternal effects, which, if genetically based, represent indirect genetic effects. A major prediction of indirect genetic effect theory is that traits without heritable variation can evolve because of the heritable environmental variation that indirect genetic effects provide. In the dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus, females provide care to offspring by provisioning a brood mass. The size of the brood mass has pronounced effects on offspring phenotype. Using a half-sib breeding design we show that the weight of the brood mass females produce exhibits significant levels of additive genetic variance due to sires. However, variance caused by dams is considerably larger, demonstrating that maternal effects are also important. Body size exhibited low additive genetic variance. However, body size exerts a strong maternal influence on the weight of brood masses produced, accounting for 22% of the nongenetic variance in offspring body size. Maternal body size also influenced the number of offspring produced but there was no genetic variance for this trait. Offspring body size and brood mass weight exhibited positive genetic and phenotypic correlations. We conclude that both indirect genetic effects, via maternal care, and nongenetic maternal effects, via female size, play important roles in the evolution of phenotype in this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11983863      PMCID: PMC124488          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.092676199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Parent-offspring coadaptation and the dual genetic control of maternal care.

Authors:  A F Agrawal; E D Brodie; J Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  J Hunt; L W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection.

Authors:  A Qvarnström; T D. Price
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Genetic variation in paternal investment in a seed beetle.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  The adaptive significance of maternal effects.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; C W Fox
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Multiple selection responses in house mice bidirectionally selected for thermoregulatory nest-building behavior: crosses of replicate lines.

Authors:  A Bult; C B Lynch
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  The quantitative genetic basis of offspring solicitation and parental response in a passerine bird with biparental care.

Authors:  M Kölliker; M W Brinkhof; P Heeb; P S Fitze; H Richner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Covariance between direct and maternal genetic effects in mice, with a model of persistent environmental influences.

Authors:  B Riska; J J Rutledge; W R Atchley
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Genetic merit for milk production and reproductive success in dairy cows.

Authors:  S E Snijders; P G Dillon; K J O'Farrell; M Diskin; A R Wylie; D O'Callaghan; M Rath; M P Boland
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2001-01-31       Impact factor: 2.145

View more
  20 in total

1.  The mother-in-law effect.

Authors:  John Hunt; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.

Authors:  Donna Petfield; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.

Authors:  Christine W Miller; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The quantitative genetics of sex differences in parenting.

Authors:  Craig A Walling; Clare E Stamper; Per T Smiseth; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Levels of selection on threshold characters.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Timothy A Linksvayer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  DNA methylation as a mechanism of nutritional plasticity: limited support from horned beetles.

Authors:  Emilie C Snell-Rood; Ashley Troth; Armin P Moczek
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.656

7.  Larval and nurse worker control of developmental plasticity and the evolution of honey bee queen-worker dimorphism.

Authors:  T A Linksvayer; O Kaftanoglu; E Akyol; S Blatch; G V Amdam; R E Page
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Inheritance of nesting behaviour across natural environmental variation in a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Lisa E Schwanz; Rachel M Bowden; Julie E Gonzalez; Fredric J Janzen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Maternal effects and the response to selection in red squirrels.

Authors:  Andrew G McAdam; Stan Boutin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Post-genomic behavioral genetics: From revolution to routine.

Authors:  D G Ashbrook; M K Mulligan; R W Williams
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.